Skip to content
https://aquadec.com.au

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP Server✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
89% efficient
REVIEW
89% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 89%
An estimated 165 KB (11%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 165 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.05g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
89% efficient

Total waste: 165 KB (11% of page weight)

Unused JS 165 KB

0.05g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1453 KB
Theoretical minimum 1288 KB
Potential savings 165 KB (0.05g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.40g CO2 per view
PASS
0.40g CO2 per view
Info::
0.40g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.40g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.07g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.26g.
Got: 0.40g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 48.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 48.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6029 smartphones.

0.40g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 70% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.4 MB

Your site
0.40g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.07g
Network
0.07g
End-user device
0.26g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.0 kg · Annual: 48.2 kg · ≈ 6029 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 38 KB (vs 1453 KB first visit). 41 of 42 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.39g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.40g)
First visit
1453 KB
Repeat visit
38 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.39g CO2 per returning visitor

41 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
30th percentile
PASS
30th percentile
Info::
0.40g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 70% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 30th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.40g

30th percentile

Cleaner than 70% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 33% cleaner ✓
vs Target 20% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization
8 images, 498 KB total, 383 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

8

Total Size

498 KB

Oversized

3

Wasted

383 KB

4 missing dimensions 3 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback