Skip to content
https://atw.hu

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Transfer Efficiency
85% efficient
REVIEW
85% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 85%
An estimated 132 KB (15%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 132 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.04g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
85% efficient

Total waste: 132 KB (15% of page weight)

Unused JS 132 KB

0.04g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 882 KB
Theoretical minimum 750 KB
Potential savings 132 KB (0.04g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.24g CO2 per view
PASS
0.24g CO2 per view
Info::
0.24g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.24g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.04g, end-user device 0.16g.
Got: 0.24g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 29.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 29.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 3662 smartphones.

0.24g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 86% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.9 MB

Your site
0.24g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.05g
Network
0.04g
End-user device
0.16g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.4 kg · Annual: 29.3 kg · ≈ 3662 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 13 KB (vs 882 KB first visit). 26 of 27 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.24g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.24g)
First visit
882 KB
Repeat visit
13 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.24g CO2 per returning visitor

26 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
14th percentile
PASS
14th percentile
Info::
0.24g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 86% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 14th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.24g

14th percentile

Cleaner than 86% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 59% cleaner ✓
vs Target 51% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback