Performance
· 14 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
656 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
13.18 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.96 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
13.21 s
Page Load Progression
FPage Weight BudgetAction15.9 MB transferred, 251 requestsFIX
Convert images to WebP/AVIF and resize to display dimensions to reduce transfer size.
Image bandwidth is high — modern formats (WebP/AVIF) and resizing typically cut it 50%+.
Source: web.dev
Large JavaScript bundles delay interactivity. Split code by route or defer non-critical scripts.
JavaScript bundle is large — code-split routes and lazy-load off-screen components to defer.
Source: web.dev
Subset fonts to include only used characters, or switch to system font stacks.
Font payload is large — subset to used glyphs only, or fall back to system fonts (zero load time).
Source: web.dev font loading
Each request adds latency. Bundle small files, use sprites, or eliminate unnecessary requests.
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
Source: web.dev
DThird-Party ImpactAction100% third-party, 0 ms blockingFIX
FJS Execution CostAction44083ms total JS executionFIX
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-P4SVK2H9N8 | 42824ms | 505ms | 0ms | 3rd |
| https://www.beautybakerie.com/ | 1041ms | 57ms | 5ms | 3rd |
| Unattributable | 105ms | 4ms | 0ms | 3rd |
| https://www.beautybakerie.com/cdn/shop/t/427/assets/theme.js?v=90278808250692751391763673199 | 57ms | 31ms | 0ms | 3rd |
| https://static.klaviyo.com/onsite/js/build-preview/commit-98747c9b1816a2f78e748cdc073a286a0296d9f7/vendors~in_app_forms~signup_forms~reviews~atlas.0201e888d834a3782e3a.js?cb=2 | 57ms | 54ms | 1ms | 3rd |
DJS BundlesAction121 scripts, 385 KB unusedFIX
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://cdn.accessibly.app/accessibly/2.0.3/accessibly.js | 222 KB | 75 KB (34%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-P4SVK2H9N8 | 167 KB | 59 KB (35%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://static-tracking.klaviyo.com/onsite/js/build-preview/commit-98747c9b1816a2f78e748cdc073a286a0296d9f7/Render.f778b94f6021eec68929.js | 52 KB | 36 KB (71%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.beautybakerie.com/cdn/wpm/b0e8c7c7aw41bd75a1p837d7fd4m8b145375m.js | 61 KB | 30 KB (51%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://cdn1.stamped.io/files/widget.min.js | 30 KB | 30 KB (100%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://cdn1.stamped.io/files/widget.min.js | 0 KB | 30 KB (100%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://cdn.attn.tv/tag/4-latest/unified-tag.js?v=4-latest_377e072d20 | 49 KB | 29 KB (58%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://sdk.loyaltylion.net/static/2/20260408/loader.js | 37 KB | 26 KB (71%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://cdn1.stamped.io/files/widget.min.js?shop=beauty-bakerie-dev.myshopify.com | 30 KB | 26 KB (86%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.beautybakerie.com/cdn/shop/t/427/assets/legacy.js?v=131369446096006678461763673144 | 39 KB | 23 KB (59%) | ✓ | 3rd |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
DHTTP CachingActionno-store (uncacheable)FIX
private, max-age=0, no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
| Directive | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| private | — | Only browser cache, not CDN/proxy |
| max-age | 0 | Cache for 0 seconds |
| no-store | — | Never cache this response |
| no-cache | — | Cache but always revalidate first |
| must-revalidate | — | Must recheck with server after expiry |
| post-check | 0 | |
| pre-check | 0 |
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
AImage Optimization36 images, 0 KB saveablePASS
A+Font Loading13 fonts (671 KB)PASS
Web fonts
13
671 KB total
Render-blocking
0
of 13
Dominant font-display
swap
Most common across fonts
Font loading timeline
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
- Subset this font — over 100 KB suggests Latin Extended or full glyph coverage that most pages don't need
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
Optimization checklist
- Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
- Use woff2 format for all fonts
- Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
- Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)
Fixing the unchecked items could save ~307 KB and ~614 ms
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource HintsNo optimization neededPASS
A+Green HostingWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructurePASS
Green Hosting
This site is hosted on green energy infrastructure
Provider: Cloudflare
Network Waterfall251 requests over 0msINFO
Performance analysis not available for this result.
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 42824ms | 167 KB | 35% | €227/mo | Costly |
www.beautybakerie.com www.beautybakerie.com | Other | 1041ms | 54 KB | — | €6/mo | Costly |
Unattributable Unattributable | Other | 105ms | 0 KB | — | €1/mo | Optional |
www.beautybakerie.com www.beautybakerie.com | Other | 57ms | 28 KB | — | €0/mo | Optional |
static.klaviyo.com static.klaviyo.com | Other | 57ms | 10 KB | — | €0/mo | Optional |
These scripts may cost more than they're worth
- Google Tag Manager adds 42824ms and costs ~€227/month
- www.beautybakerie.com adds 1041ms and costs ~€6/month
100% of JavaScript execution time is spent on third-party scripts. Consider auditing which scripts are essential.
When third-party JS execution time exceeds your own, performance gains from frontend work are capped by code you don't own.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Every millisecond of third-party JS competes with your own for main-thread time. If their share is bigger than yours, optimization on your code base barely moves the needle. Audit, defer, or remove third-parties before further frontend optimization. Use Lighthouse's third-party audit to identify the worst offenders.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 42824ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
www.beautybakerie.com takes 1041ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev