Skip to content
https://birsayt.az

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.51g CO2 per view
FIX
1.51g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.51g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 5.3 MB, producing an estimated 1.51g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.28g, network 0.26g, end-user device 0.97g.
Got: 1.51g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 181.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 181.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 22634 smartphones.

1.51g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 25% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 5.3 MB

Your site
1.51g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.28g
Network
0.26g
End-user device
0.97g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 15.1 kg · Annual: 181.1 kg · ≈ 22634 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
75th percentile
FIX
75th percentile
Warning::
1.51g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 25% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 75th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.51g

75th percentile

Cleaner than 25% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 151% more
vs Target 202% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
PASS
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 202 KB (vs 5456 KB first visit). 242 of 243 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.45g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.06g CO2 (first visit: 1.51g)
First visit
5456 KB
Repeat visit
202 KB

96% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.45g CO2 per returning visitor

242 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 342 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 342 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 342 KB

0.09g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 5456 KB
Theoretical minimum 5113 KB
Potential savings 342 KB (0.09g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
49 images, 2706 KB total, 2561 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

49

Total Size

2706 KB

Oversized

5

Wasted

2561 KB

5 missing dimensions 18 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback