Skip to content
https://canalcaribe.com.mx

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
81
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.50g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.50g CO2 per view
Info::
0.50g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.8 MB, producing an estimated 0.50g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.09g, end-user device 0.32g.
Got: 0.50g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 60.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 60.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 7504 smartphones.

0.50g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 60% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.8 MB

Your site
0.50g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.09g
Network
0.09g
End-user device
0.32g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.0 kg · Annual: 60.0 kg · ≈ 7504 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
40th percentile
REVIEW
40th percentile
Info::
0.50g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 60% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 40th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.50g

40th percentile

Cleaner than 60% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 17% cleaner ✓
vs Target 0% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 58 KB (vs 1808 KB first visit). 65 of 66 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.48g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.50g)
First visit
1808 KB
Repeat visit
58 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.48g CO2 per returning visitor

65 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
95% efficient
PASS
95% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 95%
Only 96 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
95% efficient

Total waste: 96 KB (5% of page weight)

Unused JS 96 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1808 KB
Theoretical minimum 1712 KB
Potential savings 96 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
1 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
48 images, 200 KB total, 9 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

48

Total Size

200 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

9 KB

8 missing alt text 27 missing dimensions 44 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback