https://cateno.app
Sustainability
· 7 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
91
GRADE
A
FIX
0
REVIEW
3
PASS
4
INFO
0
Checks
74 PASS 3 REVIEW
CTransfer EfficiencyAction68% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
Action68% efficient
68% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 68%
An estimated 122 KB (32%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 122 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.03g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 122 KB (32% of page weight)
Unused JS 122 KB
0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 378 KB
Theoretical minimum 256 KB
Potential savings 122 KB (0.03g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+CO2 Per Page Load0.09g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.09g CO2 per view
0.09g CO2 per view
Info::
0.09g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.09g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.00g, network 0.02g, end-user device 0.07g.
Got: 0.09g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 10.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 10.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 1313 smartphones.
Info::
Green hosting reduces data center emissions
0.09g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 90% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.4 MB
Your site
0.09g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.00g
Network
0.02g
End-user device
0.07g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 0.9 kg · Annual: 10.5 kg · ≈ 1313 smartphone charges
A+Green HostingGreen (both)PASS
Green Hosting
Green (both)
Green (both)
Info::
Both hosting and CDN use renewable energy
Got: Hosting: Vercel, CDN: Vercel
Info::
Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments
Info::
Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green Hosting✓ Green Hosted
Hosting Vercel✓CDN Vercel✓
Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments
Vercel: Hosted on AWS/Google Cloud with renewable energy commitments
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
A+Repeat Visit Weight100% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 1 KB (vs 378 KB first visit). 9 of 10 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.09g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.09g)
First visit
378 KB
Repeat visit
1 KB
100% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.09g CO2 per returning visitor
9 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Carbon Budget10th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
10th percentile
10th percentile
Info::
0.09g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 90% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 10th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.09g
10th percentile
Cleaner than 90% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 85% cleaner ✓
vs Target 82% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.