Skip to content
https://www.compliancewire.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
8
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Microsoft IISCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
37th percentile
REVIEW
37th percentile
Info::
0.48g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 63% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 37th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.48g

37th percentile

Cleaner than 63% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 20% cleaner ✓
vs Target 4% cleaner ✓
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.48g CO2 per view
PASS
0.48g CO2 per view
Info::
0.48g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.7 MB, producing an estimated 0.48g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.31g.
Got: 0.48g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 57.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 57.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 7191 smartphones.

0.48g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 63% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.7 MB

Your site
0.48g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.09g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.31g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.8 kg · Annual: 57.5 kg · ≈ 7191 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 9 KB (vs 1733 KB first visit). 41 of 45 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.48g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.48g)
First visit
1733 KB
Repeat visit
9 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.48g CO2 per returning visitor

41 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 112 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 112 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 112 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1733 KB
Theoretical minimum 1620 KB
Potential savings 112 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
2 images, 469 KB total, 365 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

2

Total Size

469 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

365 KB

1 missing alt text 2 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback