https://ctrip.com
Sustainability
· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
84
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
1
PASS
4
INFO
0
Checks
64 PASS 1 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.29g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.29g CO2 per view
0.29g CO2 per view
Info::
0.29g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.0 MB, producing an estimated 0.29g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.05g, network 0.05g, end-user device 0.18g.
Got: 0.29g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 34.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 34.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4282 smartphones.
0.29g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 82% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.0 MB
Your site
0.29g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.05g
Network
0.05g
End-user device
0.18g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.9 kg · Annual: 34.3 kg · ≈ 4282 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight99% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 10 KB (vs 1032 KB first visit). 167 of 168 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.28g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.29g)
First visit
1032 KB
Repeat visit
10 KB
99% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.28g CO2 per returning visitor
167 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
ACarbon Budget18th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
18th percentile
18th percentile
Info::
0.29g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 82% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 18th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.29g
18th percentile
Cleaner than 82% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 52% cleaner ✓
vs Target 43% cleaner ✓
A+Transfer Efficiency91% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
91% efficient
91% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 91%
Only 90 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 90 KB (9% of page weight)
Unused JS 90 KB
0.02g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1032 KB
Theoretical minimum 942 KB
Potential savings 90 KB (0.02g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.