https://d2gtr1ztczy3gv.cloudfront.net
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
83
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Checks
84 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionNot greenFIX
Green Hosting
ActionNot green
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
Info::
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting AWS✗CDN AWS CloudFront✗
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.39g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.39g CO2 per view
0.39g CO2 per view
Info::
0.39g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.39g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.07g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.25g.
Got: 0.39g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 47.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 47.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 5904 smartphones.
0.39g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 71% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.4 MB
Your site
0.39g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.07g
Network
0.07g
End-user device
0.25g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.9 kg · Annual: 47.2 kg · ≈ 5904 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight99% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 13 KB (vs 1423 KB first visit). 31 of 32 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.39g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.39g)
First visit
1423 KB
Repeat visit
13 KB
99% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.39g CO2 per returning visitor
31 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
ACarbon Budget29th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
29th percentile
29th percentile
Info::
0.39g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 71% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 29th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.39g
29th percentile
Cleaner than 71% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 34% cleaner ✓
vs Target 21% cleaner ✓
A+Transfer Efficiency98% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
98% efficient
98% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 98%
Only 27 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 27 KB (2% of page weight)
Unused JS 27 KB
0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1423 KB
Theoretical minimum 1396 KB
Potential savings 27 KB (0.01g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
Image Optimization7 images, 1474 KB total, 617 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
7 images, 1474 KB total, 617 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
7
Total Size
1474 KB
Oversized
2
Wasted
617 KB
7 missing dimensions 2 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.