Skip to content
https://dr.dk

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
60
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
4.70g CO2 per view
FIX
4.70g CO2 per view
Critical::
4.70g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 16.6 MB, producing an estimated 4.70g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.87g, network 0.81g, end-user device 3.02g.
Got: 4.70g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 563.7 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 563.7 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 70457 smartphones.

4.70g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 16.6 MB

Your site
4.70g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.87g
Network
0.81g
End-user device
3.02g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 47.0 kg · Annual: 563.7 kg · ≈ 70457 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Next.jsCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
4.70g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

4.70g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 683% more
vs Target 839% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 116 KB (vs 16984 KB first visit). 179 of 186 resources are served from browser cache, saving 4.67g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 4.70g)
First visit
16984 KB
Repeat visit
116 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 4.67g CO2 per returning visitor

179 resources served from cache · 7 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 554 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 554 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 554 KB

0.15g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 16984 KB
Theoretical minimum 16429 KB
Potential savings 554 KB (0.15g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
105 images, 1 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

105

Total Size

1 KB

1 missing dimensions 17 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback