Skip to content
https://e621.net

SEO

· 14 checks — Canonical, meta, content depth, internal links, image SEO, and hreflang rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
89
GRADE
B
FIX
0
REVIEW
6
PASS
7
INFO
1

Cross-tab audit — SEO, performance, crawlability, mobile, structured data

Checks
14
7 PASS 6 REVIEW
B
Canonical URL
Minor issues
REVIEW
Minor issues
Warning::
No canonical tag found
Search engines will determine the canonical URL themselves, which may cause duplicate content issues.
No Canonical URL Set
Page URL https://e621.net Canonical (not set)

Search engines will determine the canonical URL themselves, which may cause duplicate content issues.

Why this matters

Without a canonical, Google may treat each URL variant (with/without slash, with tracking params, http/https) as duplicate content and split ranking.

Learn more ▾

A canonical link tells Google which URL is the 'real' one when multiple URLs serve identical content. Without it, link equity gets split across variants and none of them rank as well as a single canonical version would. One <link rel="canonical"> tag in <head> covers it.

Source: Google Search Central

B
Meta Tags
Title: 4 chars
REVIEW
Title: 4 chars
Info::
Page title is set
Got: e621
Warning::
Title is only 4 characters — consider expanding
Info::
Meta description is only 4 characters — too short to be informative
Info::
Title and H1 have very different wording
Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.
Title

"e621"

4 characters Too short
Title: e621
H1: Terms of Use
Match: Very different
Robots: Indexable (no restrictions)

Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.

Why this matters

Title and H1 disagree significantly — Google may treat one as the canonical topic and the other as off-topic, weakening ranking.

Learn more ▾

Title is the SERP headline; H1 is the on-page headline. They should describe the same page. Large divergence (different topics, different keywords) signals confusion and Google may rewrite the title in SERP. Align both to the same primary topic.

Source: Google Search Central / on-page SEO

B
Image SEO
7 images, 0 descriptive filenames
REVIEW
7 images, 0 descriptive filenames
Warning::
100% of images have non-descriptive filenames
Search engines use filenames as a signal. Rename to descriptive names like 'team-photo.jpg'.
0 descriptive
0 hash-based
7 generic
7 total
FilenameQualityAltIssues
5.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 5.png
Suggested: counter.png
6.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 6.png
Suggested: counter.png
1.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 1.png
Suggested: counter.png
1.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 1.png
Suggested: counter.png
2.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 2.png
Suggested: counter.png
5.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 5.png
Suggested: counter.png
1.pnggeneric✓1
Current: 1.png
Suggested: counter.png

See Accessibility tab for detailed alt text quality analysis.

Search engines use filenames as a signal. Rename to descriptive names like 'team-photo.jpg'.

Why this matters

Most image filenames are non-descriptive (hash/IMG_X) — small SEO miss for Image Search ranking.

Source: Google Image SEO

C
Sitemap Freshness
Action
No sitemap.xml found
REVIEW
No sitemap.xml found
Info::
No sitemap.xml found
Sitemaps help search engines discover and prioritize URLs. Not strictly required for small sites where every page is linked from the homepage, but recommended once a site grows beyond a few dozen URLs.
C
Sitemap × Robots Consistency
Action
Sitemap or robots.txt missing -- consistency check skipped
REVIEW
Sitemap or robots.txt missing -- consistency check skipped
Info::
Cross-check skipped (sitemap or robots.txt absent)
B
Schema Markup Audit
2 schema types detected
REVIEW

Rich result eligibility

WebSite Not eligible

Sitelinks search box

Missing: name

WebSite Eligible

Sitelinks search box

Detected schema types

WebSite json-ld → Sitelinks search box
1/2 required · 1/1 recommended
Required fields (Google)
  • name — Add the site name Required for the sitelinks search box
  • url — Required to anchor the search box to your domain
Recommended fields
  • potentialAction — Enables the in-SERP search box
Google's spec for this type
WebSite json-ld → Sitelinks search box
2/2 required · 0/1 recommended
Required fields (Google)
  • name — Required for the sitelinks search box
  • url — Required to anchor the search box to your domain
Recommended fields
  • potentialAction — Add a SearchAction with target and query-input Enables the in-SERP search box
Google's spec for this type

Your WebSite structured data is missing required fields for Google's Sitelinks search box. Without these, the page won't qualify for rich results.

Why this matters

Schema entity missing required properties — Google's rich-result eligibility check fails; the schema is in source but never renders enhanced.

Source: Google Search Central

Adding these recommended fields improves chances of getting Sitelinks search box in search results.

Why this matters

Schema entity has required fields but could add recommended ones for richer SERP layouts (star ratings, prices, etc.).

Source: Google Search Central

A+
Title Style Depth
Title style is clean -- consistent separator, no stale year, no keyword stuffing
PASS
Title style is clean -- consistent separator, no stale year, no keyword stuffing
Info::
Title style is clean
A+
Content Depth
6780 words, Difficult
PASS
6780 words, Difficult
Info::
Page has 6780 words — good depth for search engines
Info::
Reading level: Difficult (grade 16)
6780 words

Good depth

Reading level

Very Easy
Easy
Fairly Easy
Standard
Fairly Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult

Grade 16

Text-to-HTML Ratio

58% text 42% HTML

41 KB / 71 KB

A+
Hreflang URL Quality
No hreflang tags on the page
PASS
No hreflang tags on the page
Info::
No hreflang tags on the page
A+
Hreflang Completeness
No hreflang tags on this page -- check is N/A (single-language site or unannotated)
PASS
No hreflang tags on this page -- check is N/A (single-language site or unannotated)
Info::
No hreflang tags found -- completeness check is N/A
A+
Sitemap Hygiene
No sitemap to evaluate -- depth check is N/A
PASS
No sitemap to evaluate -- depth check is N/A
Info::
No sitemap fetched -- depth check skipped
A
Markup Quality
2 markup-quality issue(s) detected
PASS
2 markup-quality issue(s) detected
Warning::
No `<meta charset>` declaration in HTML
The page has no `<meta charset="...">` tag. Browsers fall back to a default encoding (typically UTF-8 in modern browsers, but not guaranteed). Add `<meta charset="utf-8">` as the first child of `<head>` to make the encoding explicit.
Info::
1 redundant ARIA role attribute(s) on native semantic element(s)
The W3C "ARIA in HTML" spec calls this its first rule: don't use ARIA when a native HTML element already conveys the semantics. `<button role="button">`, `<a href role="link">`, `<nav role="navigation">`, `<main role="main">` -- the role attribute either does nothing or shadows the native semantic, occasionally breaking assistive-tech behaviors. Remove the redundant role.
Hreflang
0 hreflang tags
INFO
0 hreflang tags

No hreflang tags detected.

Hreflang tags are only needed for multilingual or multi-regional sites.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback