https://eaglehosting.in
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
82 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
DCO2 Per Page LoadAction1.20g CO2 per viewFIX
CO2 Per Page Load
Action1.20g CO2 per view
1.20g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.20g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.2 MB, producing an estimated 1.20g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.22g, network 0.21g, end-user device 0.77g.
Got: 1.20g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 144.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 144.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 18052 smartphones.
1.20g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 33% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.2 MB
Your site
1.20g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.22g
Network
0.21g
End-user device
0.77g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 12.0 kg · Annual: 144.4 kg · ≈ 18052 smartphone charges
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
DCarbon BudgetAction67th percentileFIX
Carbon Budget
Action67th percentile
67th percentile
Warning::
1.20g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 33% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 67th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
1.20g
67th percentile
Cleaner than 33% of websites
✗ Above the median website
vs Median 101% more
vs Target 141% more
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Repeat Visit Weight100% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 1 KB (vs 4351 KB first visit). 49 of 50 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.20g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 1.20g)
First visit
4351 KB
Repeat visit
1 KB
100% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 1.20g CO2 per returning visitor
49 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency94% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 242 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 242 KB (6% of page weight)
Unused JS 242 KB
0.07g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 4351 KB
Theoretical minimum 4109 KB
Potential savings 242 KB (0.07g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
Image Optimization11 images, 9907 KB total, 2805 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
11 images, 9907 KB total, 2805 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
11
Total Size
9907 KB
Oversized
3
Wasted
2805 KB
11 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.