Skip to content
https://elperiodico.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
62
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.11g CO2 per view
FIX
1.11g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.11g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.9 MB, producing an estimated 1.11g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.21g, network 0.19g, end-user device 0.72g.
Got: 1.11g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 133.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 133.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 16721 smartphones.

1.11g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 36% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.9 MB

Your site
1.11g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.21g
Network
0.19g
End-user device
0.72g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 11.1 kg · Annual: 133.8 kg · ≈ 16721 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
64th percentile
FIX
64th percentile
Warning::
1.11g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 36% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 64th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.11g

64th percentile

Cleaner than 36% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 86% more
vs Target 123% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
62% efficient
REVIEW
62% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 62%
An estimated 1529 KB (38%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1529 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.42g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
62% efficient

Total waste: 1529 KB (38% of page weight)

Unused JS 1529 KB

0.42g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4030 KB
Theoretical minimum 2501 KB
Potential savings 1529 KB (0.42g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
95% cached
PASS
95% cached
Info::
95% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 220 KB (vs 4030 KB first visit). 170 of 175 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.05g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.06g CO2 (first visit: 1.11g)
First visit
4030 KB
Repeat visit
220 KB

95% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.05g CO2 per returning visitor

170 resources served from cache · 5 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback