https://elvalordemiweb.com
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
86
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionUnknownFIX
Green Hosting
ActionUnknown
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BTransfer Efficiency83% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
83% efficient
83% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 83%
An estimated 110 KB (17%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 110 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.03g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 110 KB (17% of page weight)
Unused JS 110 KB
0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 636 KB
Theoretical minimum 526 KB
Potential savings 110 KB (0.03g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+CO2 Per Page Load0.18g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.18g CO2 per view
0.18g CO2 per view
Info::
0.18g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.18g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.03g, network 0.03g, end-user device 0.11g.
Got: 0.18g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 21.1 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 21.1 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 2641 smartphones.
0.18g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 90% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.6 MB
Your site
0.18g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.03g
Network
0.03g
End-user device
0.11g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 1.8 kg · Annual: 21.1 kg · ≈ 2641 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight97% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 17 KB (vs 636 KB first visit). 41 of 43 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.17g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.18g)
First visit
636 KB
Repeat visit
17 KB
97% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.17g CO2 per returning visitor
41 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded
A+Carbon Budget10th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
10th percentile
10th percentile
Info::
0.18g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 90% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 10th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.18g
10th percentile
Cleaner than 90% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 71% cleaner ✓
vs Target 65% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization12 images, 97 KB total, 0 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
12 images, 97 KB total, 0 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
12
Total Size
97 KB
2 missing alt text 12 missing dimensions 11 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.