Performance
· 17 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.98 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.00 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
153 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.98 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.00 s
Page Load Progression
DHTTP CachingActionNo cache headersFIX
No Cache-Control header
Adding a Cache-Control header can significantly improve repeat-visit performance.
BThird-Party Impact56% third-party, 0 ms blockingREVIEW
BJS Execution Cost647ms total JS executionREVIEW
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-J7MNVB218J&cx=c&_slc=1 | 198ms | 147ms | 46ms | 3rd |
| Unattributable | 190ms | 71ms | 0ms | 3rd |
| https://emptyhammock.com/vendor/materialize/js/materialize.min.js | 116ms | 22ms | 14ms | 1st |
| https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js | 76ms | 52ms | 6ms | 3rd |
| https://emptyhammock.com/vendor/jquery/jquery-2.1.1.min.js | 67ms | 55ms | 7ms | 1st |
BJS Bundles4 scripts, 105 KB unusedREVIEW
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-J7MNVB218J&cx=c&_slc=1 | 148 KB | 64 KB (43%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://emptyhammock.com/vendor/materialize/js/materialize.min.js | 49 KB | 41 KB (83%) | ✓ | 1st |
| https://emptyhammock.com/vendor/jquery/jquery-2.1.1.min.js | 29 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js | 21 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Page Weight Budget530 KB transferred, 14 requestsPASS
Subset fonts to include only used characters, or switch to system font stacks.
Font payload is large — subset to used glyphs only, or fall back to system fonts (zero load time).
Source: web.dev font loading
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
A+Image OptimizationNo images on this pagePASS
A+Font Loading3 fonts (253 KB)PASS
Web fonts
3
253 KB total
Render-blocking
0
of 3
Dominant font-display
swap
Most common across fonts
Font loading timeline
- Subset this font — over 100 KB suggests Latin Extended or full glyph coverage that most pages don't need
Optimization checklist
- Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
- Use woff2 format for all fonts
- Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
- Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)
Fixing the unchecked items could save ~63 KB and ~126 ms
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource HintsNo optimization neededPASS
APage Weight Inventory14 resources · 530 KB · 105 KB savings availablePASS
~104.6 KiB of savings available
| # | Resource | Type | Size | Cache | Unused | 3rd party | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | ||||||
| 14 resources | 530.1 KiB | ||||||
A+Render-Blocking ResourcesNo render-blocking resources detectedPASS
A+Third-Party ResourcesNo third-party resources detectedPASS
Network Waterfall14 requests over 1316msINFO
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 198ms | 148 KB | 43% | $3/mo | Optional |
Unattributable Unattributable | Other | 190ms | 0 KB | — | $3/mo | Optional |
Google Analytics www.google-analytics.com | Analytics | 76ms | 21 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
72% of JavaScript execution time is spent on third-party scripts. Consider auditing which scripts are essential.
When third-party JS execution time exceeds your own, performance gains from frontend work are capped by code you don't own.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Every millisecond of third-party JS competes with your own for main-thread time. If their share is bigger than yours, optimization on your code base barely moves the needle. Audit, defer, or remove third-parties before further frontend optimization. Use Lighthouse's third-party audit to identify the worst offenders.
Source: web.dev