Skip to content
https://fiat.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
73
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.12g CO2 per view
FIX
1.12g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.12g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.0 MB, producing an estimated 1.12g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.21g, network 0.19g, end-user device 0.72g.
Got: 1.12g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 134.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 134.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 16789 smartphones.

1.12g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 36% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.0 MB

Your site
1.12g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.21g
Network
0.19g
End-user device
0.72g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 11.2 kg · Annual: 134.3 kg · ≈ 16789 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
64th percentile
FIX
64th percentile
Warning::
1.12g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 36% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 64th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.12g

64th percentile

Cleaner than 36% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 87% more
vs Target 124% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
86% cached
PASS
86% cached
Info::
86% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 564 KB (vs 4047 KB first visit). 145 of 154 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.96g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.16g CO2 (first visit: 1.12g)
First visit
4047 KB
Repeat visit
564 KB

86% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.96g CO2 per returning visitor

145 resources served from cache · 9 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
92% efficient
PASS
92% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 92%
Only 316 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
92% efficient

Total waste: 316 KB (8% of page weight)

Unused JS 316 KB

0.09g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4047 KB
Theoretical minimum 3731 KB
Potential savings 316 KB (0.09g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
29 images, 320 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

29

Total Size

320 KB

26 missing alt text 3 missing dimensions 25 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback