Skip to content
https://fiat.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
61
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
6.45g CO2 per view
FIX
6.45g CO2 per view
Critical::
6.45g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 22.8 MB, producing an estimated 6.45g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 1.19g, network 1.11g, end-user device 4.14g.
Got: 6.45g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 773.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 773.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 96703 smartphones.

6.45g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 22.8 MB

Your site
6.45g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
1.19g
Network
1.11g
End-user device
4.14g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 64.5 kg · Annual: 773.6 kg · ≈ 96703 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
6.45g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

6.45g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 974% more
vs Target 1189% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 517 KB (vs 23310 KB first visit). 134 of 142 resources are served from browser cache, saving 6.30g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.14g CO2 (first visit: 6.45g)
First visit
23310 KB
Repeat visit
517 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 6.30g CO2 per returning visitor

134 resources served from cache · 8 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
99% efficient
PASS
99% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 99%
Only 294 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
99% efficient

Total waste: 294 KB (1% of page weight)

Unused JS 294 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 23310 KB
Theoretical minimum 23016 KB
Potential savings 294 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
32 images, 896 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

32

Total Size

896 KB

29 missing alt text 3 missing dimensions 25 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback