https://fudinoo.hu
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
76
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Checks
83 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
DGreen HostingActionNot greenFIX
Green Hosting
ActionNot green
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP Server✗CDN Not identified✗
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
BTransfer Efficiency75% efficientREVIEW
Transfer Efficiency
75% efficient
75% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 75%
An estimated 286 KB (25%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 286 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.08g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
Total waste: 286 KB (25% of page weight)
Unused JS 286 KB
0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 1150 KB
Theoretical minimum 864 KB
Potential savings 286 KB (0.08g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
ACO2 Per Page Load0.32g CO2 per viewPASS
CO2 Per Page Load
0.32g CO2 per view
0.32g CO2 per view
Info::
0.32g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.1 MB, producing an estimated 0.32g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.06g, network 0.06g, end-user device 0.20g.
Got: 0.32g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 38.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 38.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 4774 smartphones.
0.32g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 79% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.1 MB
Your site
0.32g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.06g
Network
0.06g
End-user device
0.20g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.2 kg · Annual: 38.2 kg · ≈ 4774 smartphone charges
A+Repeat Visit Weight99% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 16 KB (vs 1150 KB first visit). 42 of 43 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.31g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.32g)
First visit
1150 KB
Repeat visit
16 KB
99% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 0.31g CO2 per returning visitor
42 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
ACarbon Budget21th percentilePASS
Carbon Budget
21th percentile
21th percentile
Info::
0.32g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 79% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 21th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
0.32g
21st percentile
Cleaner than 79% of websites
✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target
vs Median 47% cleaner ✓
vs Target 36% cleaner ✓
Image Optimization31 images, 376 KB total, 76 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
31 images, 376 KB total, 76 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
31
Total Size
376 KB
Oversized
7
Wasted
76 KB
4 missing dimensions 29 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.