Skip to content
https://hackaday.io

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
62
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.58g CO2 per view
FIX
1.58g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.58g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 5.6 MB, producing an estimated 1.58g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.29g, network 0.27g, end-user device 1.01g.
Got: 1.58g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 189.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 189.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 23668 smartphones.

1.58g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 23% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 5.6 MB

Your site
1.58g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.29g
Network
0.27g
End-user device
1.01g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 15.8 kg · Annual: 189.4 kg · ≈ 23668 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
77th percentile
FIX
77th percentile
Warning::
1.58g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 23% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 77th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.58g

77th percentile

Cleaner than 23% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 163% more
vs Target 216% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 10 KB (vs 5705 KB first visit). 48 of 50 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.58g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 1.58g)
First visit
5705 KB
Repeat visit
10 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.58g CO2 per returning visitor

48 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
95% efficient
PASS
95% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 95%
Only 274 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
95% efficient

Total waste: 274 KB (5% of page weight)

Unused JS 274 KB

0.08g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 5705 KB
Theoretical minimum 5431 KB
Potential savings 274 KB (0.08g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback