Accessibility
· 13 checks — Landmarks, headings, alt text, forms, and link quality rolled into one auditable list.DLandmark StructureAction4 landmarksFIX
Screen reader users cannot quickly navigate to the primary content. Wrap your main content in <main>.
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Learn more ▾ ▴
The <main> element marks the page's primary content area. Assistive tech offers a 'jump to main' shortcut — but only if <main> exists. Without it, every page navigation forces re-reading the header. Wrap your primary content in a single <main>.
Source: WAI-ARIA / WCAG 2.4.1
Multiple navigations need aria-label to distinguish them for screen readers.
Some <nav> elements lack aria-label — screen-reader users hear 'navigation' multiple times with no way to distinguish them.
Learn more ▾ ▴
When a page has multiple <nav> regions (primary, footer, breadcrumb), each needs aria-label or aria-labelledby. AT users navigate by landmark; identical 'navigation' announcements force them to enter each one to discover purpose.
Source: WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices
Add a skip link as the first focusable element so keyboard users can bypass repeated navigation.
Without a skip-nav link, keyboard users tab through every nav item before reaching content — every page, every visit.
Learn more ▾ ▴
WCAG 2.4.1 (Bypass Blocks) requires a mechanism to skip past repeated content. The standard implementation is a 'Skip to main content' link that's the first focusable element, visually hidden until focused. Three lines of HTML + four of CSS.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 2.4.1
FHeading HierarchyAction67 headings, 18 skip(s)FIX
- H5 Performance
- H5 Creator
- H5 Advocate
- H1 One platform. All partnerships. AI-powered.
- H2 Creators.
- H2 Affiliates.
- H2 Customer referrals.
- H2 Communities.
- H2 Unified.
- H2 The AI-native partnership platform powering global commerce
- H2 Affiliate, Creator, and Referral programs together at last
- H5 Stop juggling multiple tools and fragmented data. Finally, manage all your partnerships from one dashboard. skipped
- H5 No more silos. No more switching between platforms. Just one platform where you can see which partnerships actually drive sales.
- H3 The ROI case for unified partnership management
- H6 Brands using affiliates + influencers drive up to 46% more sales than single-channel strategies skipped
- H2 46%
- H6 Integrating referrals with affiliate can lift revenue by as much as 22% skipped
- H2 22%
- H6 You save 15+ hours per week managing partnerships from one dashboard instead of three skipped
- H2 15+
- H3 Why it matters now
- H6 AI-driven traffic to retail sites: up 4,700% YoY skipped
- H2 4,700%
- H6 Shoppers using AI for purchases: 39% (53% plan to this year) skipped
- H2 39%
- H6 Gen Z using AI search daily: 35% skipped
- H2 35%
- H2 Why leading brands are shifting marketing budget to partnerships
- H5 Paid ads hit a ceiling skipped
- H5 Consumers trust people, not ads
- H5 AI accelerates everything
- H2 Finally see which partnerships actually drive sales
- H3 Stop guessing which partners are worth your budget.
- H2 We uncover which partnerships generate revenue, not just clicks and traffic
- H2 Track real results from influencer campaigns, not just engagement. #1 influencer platform for performance-driven creator marketing
- H2 Turn your customers into a measurable revenue channel
- H6 (empty)
- H3 Partnerships work. But don’t just take our word for it—see the results yourself
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 23.6m
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 160%
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 3,755%
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 10+
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 421%
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 $1M
- H6 Case study skipped
- H3 160%
- H1 Take your partnership program to the next level duplicate H1
- H3 Request a demo skipped
- H4 Yes, I would like to receive marketing communications regarding impact.com products, services, and events. I can unsubscribe at a later time. By registering, you c
- H3 impact.com partnership management platform
- H2 Discover & Recruit
- H2 Contract & Pay
- H2 Track
- H2 Engage
- H2 Protect & Monitor
- H2 Optimize
- H2 We also recommend
- H6 Blog skipped
- H6 Blog
- H6 Blog
- H4 Yes, I would like to receive marketing communications regarding impact.com products, services, and events. I can unsubscribe at a later time. By registering, you confirm that you agree to the storing
A page should have only one H1. Multiple H1s dilute the document outline.
Multiple H1s blur the page's primary topic — screen-reader users and Google both prefer one H1.
Learn more ▾ ▴
HTML5's outline algorithm technically allows multiple H1s within sectioning content, but no browser implements it. In practice: one H1 per page. Use H2-H6 for subsections.
Source: WCAG 2.4.6 / Google Search Central
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
Empty headings appear in the document outline but provide no information.
Empty <hN> tags break the document outline — screen-reader users navigating by heading hit dead silence.
Source: WCAG 2.4.6
DLink & Button QualityAction8 issue(s) across 197 links and 11 buttonsFIX
| Element | Text | Issue | Suggested Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://impact.com/privacy-policy/ | Privacy Policy | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://app.impact.com/login.user | Sign in | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://app.impact.com/login.user | Sign in | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| Consumers trust people, not ad… | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image | |
| https://impact.com/creator/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Creator | |||
| https://impact.com/advocate/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Advocate | |||
| https://impact.com/case-studies/strands-… | Case study … | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image |
| https://impact.com/case-studies/taylor-h… | Case study … | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image |
| https://impact.com/case-studies/elite-su… | Case study … | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image |
| https://impact.com/case-studies/starship… | Case study … | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image |
| https://impact.com/case-studies/bill-cas… | Case study … | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image |
| https://impact.com/case-studies/scrambly… | Case study … | img no alt | Add alt attribute to the image |
| https://impact.com/privacy-policy/ | privacy policy… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://app.impact.com/signup/none/creat… | Sign up | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| /discover-recruit/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Discover Recruit | |||
| /partnership-contract-pay/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Partnership Contract Pay | |||
| /partnership-track/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Partnership Track | |||
| /manage-engage/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Manage Engage | |||
| /protect-monitor/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Protect Monitor | |||
| /optimize-insights/ | Learn more | generic text | Replace with descriptive text |
Before: Learn more Suggested: Optimize Insights | |||
| https://integrations.impact.com/ | Developer portal | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://help.impact.com/en/support/home | Help center | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| /privacy-policy/ | Privacy Policy | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.linkedin.com/company/impactd… | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text | |
| https://www.instagram.com/impactdotcom/ | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text | |
| https://www.facebook.com/impactdotcom1 | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text | |
| https://www.youtube.com/c/impactdotcom | Youtube | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://www.tiktok.com/@impactdotcom | TikTok | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://impact.com/feed/ | RSS feed | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://apps.apple.com/app/impact-com/id… | Download on the app store | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://play.google.com/store/apps/detai… | Get it on Google play | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://impact.responsibledisclosure.com… | Responsible disclosure | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://impact.com/legal/IRL_Modern_Slav… | Modern slavery statement | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
| https://impact.com/legal/PAIA_manual_imp… | PAIA manual | new tab | Add '(opens in new tab)' to text |
Generic link text like 'click here' doesn't describe the destination.
https://impact.com/creator/ ("Learn more"); https://impact.com/advocate/ ("Learn more"); /discover-recruit/ ("Learn more"); /partnership-contract-pay/ ("Learn more"); /partnership-track/ ("Learn more"); /manage-engage/ ("Learn more"); /protect-monitor/ ("Learn more"); /optimize-insights/ ("Learn more")
Generic anchor text ('click here', 'read more', 'learn more') tells screen readers and search engines nothing about the destination.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Out-of-context lists of links read by AT (one navigation pattern) become useless when every link says 'click here'. Use the destination's title or topic as anchor text. Doubles as SEO win — Google passes anchor-text relevance to the destination.
Source: WCAG 2.4.4 / Google Search Central
Image-only links need alt text on the image (or aria-label on the link) so screen readers can announce them.
a.block (#483 on page); a[href="https://impact.com/case-studies/strands-are-media-case-study-pars-csp-imp-vd-…"]; a[href="https://impact.com/case-studies/taylor-hart-case-study-affa-csb-imp-ev-emea/"]; a[href="https://impact.com/case-studies/elite-supplements-case-study-affa-csb-imp-ev-…"]; a[href="https://impact.com/case-studies/starshipit-case-study-refr-csb-adv-ev-apac/"]; a[href="https://impact.com/case-studies/bill-case-study-affa-csb-imp-ev-nam/"]; a[href="https://impact.com/case-studies/scrambly-case-study-affa-csb-imp-ev-emea/"]
Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 2.4.4
Add '(opens in new tab)' to link text or aria-label.
https://impact.com/privacy-policy/; https://app.impact.com/login.user; https://app.impact.com/login.user; https://impact.com/privacy-policy/; https://app.impact.com/signup/none/create-new-mediapartner-account-flow.ihtml…; https://integrations.impact.com/; https://help.impact.com/en/support/home; /privacy-policy/; https://www.linkedin.com/company/impactdotcom/; https://www.instagram.com/impactdotcom/ (+9 more)
Links with target="_blank" without rel="noopener" leak the originating page's window context — security and UX issue.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Without rel="noopener", the new tab can navigate the original tab via window.opener (tab-nabbing attack). Modern browsers default to noopener for target=_blank but only since recent versions. Always set rel="noopener noreferrer" explicitly.
Source: MDN target / OWASP
DWeb ManifestActionValid manifestFIX
DDark Mode SupportActionTheme color onlyFIX
Detection limited to meta tags and inline styles.
DPrint StylesheetActionNo print stylesFIX
B404 Error PageHTTP 404, custom pageREVIEW
BFavicon & Branding6 icon(s) detectedREVIEW
CColor Contrast (Screenshot)Action20 text elements analyzed, 20 fail WCAG AAREVIEW
Analyzes text contrast against the actual rendered page, including background images, gradients, and overlays that CSS-based tools cannot detect.
Show all checked elements (20)
| Element | Ratio | Required | FG | BG | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h1 One platform. All pa… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h1 Take your partnershi… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 The AI-native partne… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Affiliate, Creator, … | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 46% | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 22% | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 15+ | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 4,700% | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 39% | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 35% | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Why leading brands a… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Finally see which pa… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 We uncover which par… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Track real results f… | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Turn your customers … | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Discover & Recruit | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Contract & Pay | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Track | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Engage | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
| h2 Protect & Monitor | 1.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #000000 | Fail |
Methodology: The top 20 text elements by font size were checked. Background color was sampled from the desktop screenshot using a 5-point pattern. WCAG 2.1 AA requires 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text.
AAlt Text Quality1 of 41 images have issuesPASS
| Issue | Count |
|---|---|
| missing | 1 image(s) |
Images without alt text are invisible to screen readers.
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
Learn more ▾ ▴
WCAG 2.1 Level A requires text alternatives for non-decorative images. Empty alt='' is fine for decorative; meaningful images need descriptive text. Common fixes: CMS audit + bulk add, build-time linter (alt-text-required ESLint rule), CI gate on Lighthouse a11y score.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.1.1 / WebAIM Million Report
AForm Accessibility1 of 17 controls have issuesPASS
| Control | Type | Label | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| #osano-cm-dialog-toggle--category_MARKETING | checkbox | none | |
| #osano-cm-dialog-toggle--category_PERSONALIZATION | checkbox | none | |
| #osano-cm-dialog-toggle--category_ANALYTICS | checkbox | none | |
| #Account_Type__c | select | Company type | aria-label |
| #PC_Primary_Topic_Interest__c | select | What are you interested in? | aria-label |
| #FirstName | text | First name | for/id |
| #LastName | text | Last name | for/id |
| Business email | for/id | ||
| #Title | text | Job title | for/id |
| #Phone | tel | Business phone | for/id |
| #Country | select | Country | aria-label |
| #Company | text | Company name | for/id |
| #Website | url | Company website | for/id |
| #Existing_Affiliate_Program__c | select | Existing Affiliate program | aria-label |
| #GDPR_email_opt_in__c | checkbox | Marketing communications | aria-label |
| #newsletterEmail | Business email | for/id | |
| #GDPR_email_opt_in__c | checkbox | (none) | none |
Form controls need a <label>, aria-label, or aria-labelledby for screen readers.
<input type="checkbox" name="GDPR_email_opt_in__c" id="GDPR_email_opt_in__c">
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 3.3.2
ALighthouse Accessibility AuditsScore 91/100 — 3 failing, 32 passedPASS
Accessibility
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your web app. Automatic detection can only detect a subset of issues and does not guarantee the accessibility of your web app, so manual testing is also encouraged.
Contrast
Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Learn how to provide sufficient color contrast.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
ADVOCATE div.feature > div.feature-inner > div.left > p.caption |
Resource hub div.page-content > section.recommended-content > div.more > a |
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Navigation
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. Learn more about heading order.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
Stop juggling multiple tools and fragmented data. Finally, manage all your part… div.feature-block-inner > div.blocks > a.block > h5 |
Brands using affiliates + influencers drive up to 46% more sales than single-ch… div.inner > div.specs > div.block > h6 |
Integrating referrals with affiliate can lift revenue by as much as 22% div.inner > div.specs > div.block > h6 |
You save 15+ hours per week managing partnerships from one dashboard instead of… div.inner > div.specs > div.block > h6 |
AI-driven traffic to retail sites: up 4,700% YoY div.inner > div.specs > div.block > h6 |
Shoppers using AI for purchases: 39% (53% plan to this year) div.inner > div.specs > div.block > h6 |
Gen Z using AI search daily: 35% div.inner > div.specs > div.block > h6 |
Paid ads hit a ceiling div.feature-block-inner > div.blocks > a.block > h5 |
div.featured-series-container > div.content-column > div.content > h6 div.featured-series-container > div.content-column > div.content > h6 |
CASE STUDY div > a.insight-content-card > div.copy > h6 |
Request a demo div.consolidated-hero > div.consolidated-hero-container > div.right > h3 |
BLOG div.posts > a.insight-content-card > div.copy > h6 |
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Names and labels
Informative elements should aim for short, descriptive alternate text. Decorative elements can be ignored with an empty alt attribute. Learn more about the `alt` attribute.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
body.home > div.page-content > img body.home > div.page-content > img |
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.