Skip to content
https://interia.pl

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
81
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.62g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.62g CO2 per view
Info::
0.62g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.2 MB, producing an estimated 0.62g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.11g, network 0.11g, end-user device 0.40g.
Got: 0.62g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 74.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 74.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 9311 smartphones.

0.62g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 50% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.2 MB

Your site
0.62g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.11g
Network
0.11g
End-user device
0.40g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 6.2 kg · Annual: 74.5 kg · ≈ 9311 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
50th percentile
REVIEW
50th percentile
Warning::
0.62g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 50% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 50th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.62g

50th percentile

Cleaner than 50% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 3% more
vs Target 24% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
96% cached
PASS
96% cached
Info::
96% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 94 KB (vs 2244 KB first visit). 175 of 178 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.59g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 0.62g)
First visit
2244 KB
Repeat visit
94 KB

96% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.59g CO2 per returning visitor

175 resources served from cache · 3 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 126 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 126 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 126 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2244 KB
Theoretical minimum 2118 KB
Potential savings 126 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback