https://www.itechnologies.com.au
Sustainability
· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.SCORE
71
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
82 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
DCO2 Per Page LoadAction1.15g CO2 per viewFIX
CO2 Per Page Load
Action1.15g CO2 per view
1.15g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.15g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.1 MB, producing an estimated 1.15g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.21g, network 0.20g, end-user device 0.74g.
Got: 1.15g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 137.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 137.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 17220 smartphones.
1.15g
Carbon Footprint per page view
✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)
Cleaner than 35% of websites
Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.1 MB
Your site
1.15g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g
Energy Breakdown
Data center
0.21g
Network
0.20g
End-user device
0.74g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 11.5 kg · Annual: 137.8 kg · ≈ 17220 smartphone charges
DGreen HostingActionNot greenFIX
Green Hosting
ActionNot green
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Azure: Microsoft is carbon-negative; Azure renewable varies by region
Info::
Azure CDN: Inherits Azure regional renewable mix
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Azure✗CDN Azure CDN✗
Azure: Microsoft is carbon-negative; Azure renewable varies by region
Azure CDN: Inherits Azure regional renewable mix
Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org
DCarbon BudgetAction65th percentileFIX
Carbon Budget
Action65th percentile
65th percentile
Warning::
1.15g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 35% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 65th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website
1.15g
65th percentile
Cleaner than 35% of websites
✗ Above the median website
vs Median 91% more
vs Target 130% more
BWeb Font Weight VariantsNo detectable Google Fonts weightsREVIEW
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
ActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
A+Repeat Visit Weight98% cachedPASS
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 83 KB (vs 4151 KB first visit). 31 of 32 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.13g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.15g)
First visit
4151 KB
Repeat visit
83 KB
98% reduction on repeat visits
Saving 1.13g CO2 per returning visitor
31 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded
A+Transfer Efficiency98% efficientPASS
Transfer Efficiency
98% efficient
98% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 98%
Only 92 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
Total waste: 92 KB (2% of page weight)
Unused JS 92 KB
0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit
Actual transfer 4151 KB
Theoretical minimum 4058 KB
Potential savings 92 KB (0.03g CO2)
See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.
Image Optimization81 images, 3944 KB total, 3903 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization
81 images, 3944 KB total, 3903 KB wasted
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
81
Total Size
3944 KB
Oversized
21
Wasted
3903 KB
68 missing dimensions 7 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.