Skip to content
https://knuddels.de

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
85
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.36g CO2 per view
PASS
0.36g CO2 per view
Info::
0.36g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.3 MB, producing an estimated 0.36g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.07g, network 0.06g, end-user device 0.23g.
Got: 0.36g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 43.0 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 43.0 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 5376 smartphones.

0.36g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 75% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.3 MB

Your site
0.36g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.07g
Network
0.06g
End-user device
0.23g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.6 kg · Annual: 43.0 kg · ≈ 5376 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 45 KB (vs 1296 KB first visit). 45 of 46 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.35g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.36g)
First visit
1296 KB
Repeat visit
45 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.35g CO2 per returning visitor

45 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
25th percentile
PASS
25th percentile
Info::
0.36g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 75% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 25th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.36g

25th percentile

Cleaner than 75% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 40% cleaner ✓
vs Target 28% cleaner ✓
A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 36 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 36 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 36 KB

0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1296 KB
Theoretical minimum 1259 KB
Potential savings 36 KB (0.01g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
48 images, 151 KB total, 37 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

48

Total Size

151 KB

Oversized

2

Wasted

37 KB

44 missing alt text 15 missing dimensions
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback