Skip to content
https://lapresse.ca

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
64
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.00g CO2 per view
FIX
1.00g CO2 per view
Info::
1.00g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.5 MB, producing an estimated 1.00g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.19g, network 0.17g, end-user device 0.64g.
Got: 1.00g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 119.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 119.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 14989 smartphones.

1.00g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 39% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.5 MB

Your site
1.00g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.19g
Network
0.17g
End-user device
0.64g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 10.0 kg · Annual: 119.9 kg · ≈ 14989 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Amazon Web ServicesCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
61th percentile
FIX
61th percentile
Warning::
1.00g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 39% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 61th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.00g

61st percentile

Cleaner than 39% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 67% more
vs Target 100% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
76% efficient
REVIEW
76% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 76%
An estimated 875 KB (24%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 875 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.24g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
76% efficient

Total waste: 875 KB (24% of page weight)

Unused JS 875 KB

0.24g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3613 KB
Theoretical minimum 2738 KB
Potential savings 875 KB (0.24g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 64 KB (vs 3613 KB first visit). 174 of 178 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.98g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.00g)
First visit
3613 KB
Repeat visit
64 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.98g CO2 per returning visitor

174 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback