Performance
· 26 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.51 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.58 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
717 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.019
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
26.15 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.73 s
Page Load Progression
FPage Weight BudgetAction3.1 MB transferred, 120 requestsFIX
Convert images to WebP/AVIF and resize to display dimensions to reduce transfer size.
Image bandwidth is high — modern formats (WebP/AVIF) and resizing typically cut it 50%+.
Source: web.dev
Large JavaScript bundles delay interactivity. Split code by route or defer non-critical scripts.
JavaScript bundle is large — code-split routes and lazy-load off-screen components to defer.
Source: web.dev
Subset fonts to include only used characters, or switch to system font stacks.
Font payload is large — subset to used glyphs only, or fall back to system fonts (zero load time).
Source: web.dev font loading
Remove unused CSS rules with tools like PurgeCSS to reduce stylesheet size.
CSS bundle is large — purge unused styles (PurgeCSS, Tailwind JIT) to reduce CSS payload.
Source: web.dev
Each request adds latency. Bundle small files, use sprites, or eliminate unnecessary requests.
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
Source: web.dev
DThird-Party ImpactAction100% third-party, 0 ms blockingFIX
FJS Execution CostAction5805ms total JS executionFIX
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.latinapress.it/ | 1846ms | 374ms | 78ms | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/themes/jnews/assets/dist/frontend.min.js?ver=1.0.0 | 856ms | 302ms | 33ms | 3rd |
| Unattributable | 782ms | 15ms | 0ms | 1st |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/bannerlp/2026-07-jaecco/JAECOO7-SHSH-LUG26-728x90/index.html | 743ms | 129ms | 9ms | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1 | 592ms | 484ms | 35ms | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/youzify/includes/public/assets/js/youzify.min.js?ver=3.4.9 | 326ms | 77ms | 1ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-GS8ZLSL2WZ | 282ms | 233ms | 48ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-MQBL8FN | 217ms | 168ms | 40ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-MQBL8FN&cx=c>m=4e6781 | 58ms | 25ms | 33ms | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/elementor/assets/js/frontend.min.js?ver=4.0.5 | 52ms | 49ms | 3ms | 3rd |
Showing top 10 of 11 scripts
DPage Weight InventoryAction120 resources · 3.1 MB · 295 KB savings availableFIX
~295.4 KiB of savings available
| # | Resource | Type | Size | Cache | Unused | 3rd party | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | ||||||
| 120 resources | 3.1 MiB | ||||||
FHTTP CachingActionNo cache headersFIX
No Cache-Control header
Adding a Cache-Control header can significantly improve repeat-visit performance.
BImage Optimization16 images, 0 KB saveableREVIEW
CJS BundlesAction40 scripts, 295 KB unusedREVIEW
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-MQBL8FN&cx=c>m=4e6781 | 148 KB | 108 KB (73%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-MQBL8FN | 148 KB | 66 KB (45%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-GS8ZLSL2WZ | 148 KB | 64 KB (43%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/themes/jnews/assets/dist/frontend.min.js?ver=1.0.0 | 88 KB | 57 KB (65%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/youzify/includes/public/assets/js/youzify-profile.min.js?ver=3.4.9 | 2 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/youzify/includes/public/assets/js/youzify-slider.min.js?ver=3.4.9 | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/elementor/assets/lib/font-awesome/js/v4-shims.min.js?ver=4.0.5 | 4 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/youzify/includes/public/assets/js/youzify-viewportChecker.min.js?ver=3.4.9 | 2 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-content/plugins/ad-inserter-pro/includes/aos/aos.js?ver=2.8.14 | 5 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.latinapress.it/wp-includes/js/dist/hooks.min.js?ver=dd5603f07f9220ed27f1 | 2 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
CCompression AlgorithmActionMain response served uncompressedREVIEW
BMain HTML Cache-ControlNo Cache-Control header on main HTML responseREVIEW
BServer-Timing ObservabilityNo Server-Timing header foundREVIEW
BJavaScript Blocking2 JS blocking issue(s) detectedREVIEW
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
A+Font Loading12 fonts (508 KB)PASS
Web fonts
12
508 KB total
Render-blocking
0
of 12
Dominant font-display
swap
Most common across fonts
Font loading timeline
- Convert to woff2 for ~30% smaller file size
- Subset this font — over 100 KB suggests Latin Extended or full glyph coverage that most pages don't need
Optimization checklist
- Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
- Use woff2 format for all fonts
- Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
- Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)
Fixing the unchecked items could save ~79 KB and ~158 ms
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource Hints3 hints, 0 missing preconnectsPASS
Current Resource Hints
3 resource hints configured
A+HTTP/3 (QUIC)HTTP/3 advertised via Alt-SvcPASS
A+LCP Image PreloadLCP preload audit not availablePASS
A+Server Response Intelligence1 server-response signal(s) detectedPASS
A+Render-Blocking ResourcesNo render-blocking resources detectedPASS
A+Third-Party ResourcesNo third-party resources detectedPASS
ACSS Performance Depth1 CSS depth issue(s) detectedPASS
A+Green HostingWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructurePASS
Green Hosting
This site is hosted on green energy infrastructure
Provider: Cloudflare
Network Waterfall120 requests over 17919msINFO
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 1846ms | 86 KB | — | €10/mo | Costly |
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 856ms | 88 KB | 65% | €5/mo | Costly |
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 743ms | 0 KB | — | €4/mo | Costly |
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 592ms | 30 KB | — | €3/mo | Costly |
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 326ms | 6 KB | — | €2/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 282ms | 148 KB | 43% | €2/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 217ms | 148 KB | 45% | €1/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 58ms | 148 KB | 73% | €0/mo | Optional |
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 52ms | 11 KB | — | €0/mo | Optional |
www.latinapress.it www.latinapress.it | Other | 52ms | 86 KB | — | €0/mo | Optional |
These scripts may cost more than they're worth
- www.latinapress.it adds 1846ms and costs ~€10/month
- www.latinapress.it adds 856ms and costs ~€5/month
- www.latinapress.it adds 743ms and costs ~€4/month
- www.latinapress.it adds 592ms and costs ~€3/month
- www.latinapress.it adds 326ms and costs ~€2/month
- Google Tag Manager adds 282ms and costs ~€2/month
- Google Tag Manager adds 217ms and costs ~€1/month
87% of JavaScript execution time is spent on third-party scripts. Consider auditing which scripts are essential.
When third-party JS execution time exceeds your own, performance gains from frontend work are capped by code you don't own.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Every millisecond of third-party JS competes with your own for main-thread time. If their share is bigger than yours, optimization on your code base barely moves the needle. Audit, defer, or remove third-parties before further frontend optimization. Use Lighthouse's third-party audit to identify the worst offenders.
Source: web.dev
www.latinapress.it takes 1846ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
www.latinapress.it takes 856ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
65% of www.latinapress.it's code is unused. The script may be loading features you don't use.
Bundle has high unused-code ratio — tree-shaking and route-splitting recover the wasted bytes.
Source: web.dev
www.latinapress.it takes 743ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
www.latinapress.it takes 592ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
www.latinapress.it takes 326ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 282ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 217ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
73% of Google Tag Manager's code is unused. The script may be loading features you don't use.
Bundle has high unused-code ratio — tree-shaking and route-splitting recover the wasted bytes.
Source: web.dev
Image Optimization91 images, 2399 KB total, 393 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
91
Total Size
2399 KB
Oversized
2
Wasted
393 KB