Skip to content
https://liverpoolfc.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
64
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.37g CO2 per view
FIX
1.37g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.37g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 4.9 MB, producing an estimated 1.37g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.25g, network 0.24g, end-user device 0.88g.
Got: 1.37g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 164.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 164.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 20606 smartphones.

1.37g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 28% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 4.9 MB

Your site
1.37g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.25g
Network
0.24g
End-user device
0.88g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 13.7 kg · Annual: 164.8 kg · ≈ 20606 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
Info::
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting AWSCDN AWS CloudFront

AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025

AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
72th percentile
FIX
72th percentile
Warning::
1.37g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 28% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 72th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.37g

72nd percentile

Cleaner than 28% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 129% more
vs Target 175% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
87% efficient
REVIEW
87% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 87%
An estimated 653 KB (13%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 653 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.18g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
87% efficient

Total waste: 653 KB (13% of page weight)

Unused JS 653 KB

0.18g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 4967 KB
Theoretical minimum 4313 KB
Potential savings 653 KB (0.18g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 47 KB (vs 4967 KB first visit). 184 of 187 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.36g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 1.37g)
First visit
4967 KB
Repeat visit
47 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.36g CO2 per returning visitor

184 resources served from cache · 3 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback