Skip to content
https://lynda.com

SEO

· 7 checks — Canonical, meta, content depth, internal links, image SEO, and hreflang rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
84
GRADE
B
FIX
0
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1

Cross-tab audit — SEO, performance, crawlability, mobile, structured data

Checks
7
4 PASS 2 REVIEW
C
Canonical URL
Action
Issues found
REVIEW
Issues found
Info::
Canonical tag present
Got: https://www.linkedin.com/learning/
Warning::
Canonical does not match final URL (https://www.linkedin.com/learning/?trk=lynda_redirect_learning)
Critical::
Canonical target returns 429
Search engines cannot follow this canonical, effectively orphaning this page.
Info::
Canonical points to a different domain
Canonical URL Problem
Page URL https://lynda.com Canonical https://www.linkedin.com/learning/ Match Points to a different page Target 429

Search engines cannot follow this canonical, effectively orphaning this page.

Why this matters

Canonical URL returns a non-200 status — Google can't follow the canonical to confirm the relationship.

Source: Google Search Central

B
Image SEO
57 images, 8 descriptive filenames
REVIEW
57 images, 8 descriptive filenames
Warning::
86% of images have non-descriptive filenames
Search engines use filenames as a signal. Rename to descriptive names like 'team-photo.jpg'.
8 descriptive
27 hash-based
22 generic
57 total
FilenameQualityAltIssues
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
1678908578362hash✓1
1669258879103hash✓1
1568668254385hash✓1
1658272574632hash✓1
1658293981737hash✓1
1593630205638hash✓1
1665506470259hash✓1
1567122971401hash✓1
1757443126366hash✓1
1678908578362hash✓1
1618937081114hash✓1
1567116230457hash✓1
1685035572840hash✓1
1644001786468hash✓1
1568053857672hash✓1
1664503979068hash✓1
1568066281564hash✓1
1681413686159hash✓1
1567116230457hash✓1
1568053857672hash✓1
1568067883418hash✓1
1675884235222hash✓1
1568071018479hash✓1
1567793984620hash✓1
1583518424083hash✓1
1567794767123hash✓1
1567631258088hash✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1
.generic✓1

See Accessibility tab for detailed alt text quality analysis.

Search engines use filenames as a signal. Rename to descriptive names like 'team-photo.jpg'.

Why this matters

Most image filenames are non-descriptive (hash/IMG_X) — small SEO miss for Image Search ranking.

Source: Google Image SEO

A+
Meta Tags
Title optimized
PASS
Title optimized
Info::
Page title is set
Got: LinkedIn Learning: Online Training Courses & Skill Building
Info::
Title length (59 chars) is optimal
Info::
Title and H1 have very different wording
Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.
Title

"LinkedIn Learning: Online Training Courses & Skill Building"

59 characters Optimal ✓
Title: LinkedIn Learning: Online Training Courses & Skill Building
H1: Develop skills that move your career forward
Match: Very different
Robots: Indexable (no restrictions)

Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.

Why this matters

Title and H1 disagree significantly — Google may treat one as the canonical topic and the other as off-topic, weakening ranking.

Learn more ▾

Title is the SERP headline; H1 is the on-page headline. They should describe the same page. Large divergence (different topics, different keywords) signals confusion and Google may rewrite the title in SERP. Align both to the same primary topic.

Source: Google Search Central / on-page SEO

A
Content Depth
1593 words, Very Difficult
PASS
1593 words, Very Difficult
Info::
Page has 1593 words — good depth for search engines
Info::
Text-to-HTML ratio is 4%
Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.
Info::
Reading level: Very Difficult (grade 22)
1593 words

Good depth

Reading level

Very Easy
Easy
Fairly Easy
Standard
Fairly Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult

Grade 22

Text-to-HTML Ratio

4% text 96% HTML

11 KB / 278 KB

Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.

Why this matters

Informational: ratio of visible text bytes to total HTML bytes. Very low ratios suggest excessive markup overhead.

A+
Schema Markup Audit
Per-type completeness vs Schema.org requirements + rich-result eligibility
PASS

No structured data detected

Without JSON-LD or microdata, this page can't qualify for any of Google's rich result formats. Even basic Organization or WebSite schema is a quick win.

Missing schema opportunities

  • easy

    FAQPage

    Page has Q&A-style content (questions in headings) that could be marked up as FAQPage

    FAQ rich results take 2-3× more SERP real estate

Hreflang
0 hreflang tags
INFO
0 hreflang tags

No hreflang tags detected.

Hreflang tags are only needed for multilingual or multi-regional sites.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback