Skip to content
https://Mattsairporttransfers.co.uk

Sustainability

· 7 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
0
Checks
7
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Next.js✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
35th percentile
REVIEW
35th percentile
Info::
0.45g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 65% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 35th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.45g

35th percentile

Cleaner than 65% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 25% cleaner ✓
vs Target 9% cleaner ✓
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.45g CO2 per view
PASS
0.45g CO2 per view
Info::
0.45g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.45g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.29g.
Got: 0.45g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 54.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 54.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6793 smartphones.

0.45g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 65% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.6 MB

Your site
0.45g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.29g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.5 kg · Annual: 54.3 kg · ≈ 6793 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
90% cached
PASS
90% cached
Info::
90% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 158 KB (vs 1637 KB first visit). 36 of 37 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.41g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.04g CO2 (first visit: 0.45g)
First visit
1637 KB
Repeat visit
158 KB

90% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.41g CO2 per returning visitor

36 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
96% efficient
PASS
96% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 96%
Only 72 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
96% efficient

Total waste: 72 KB (4% of page weight)

Unused JS 72 KB

0.02g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1637 KB
Theoretical minimum 1565 KB
Potential savings 72 KB (0.02g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback