Skip to content
https://mediapart.fr

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.94g CO2 per view
FIX
0.94g CO2 per view
Info::
0.94g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.3 MB, producing an estimated 0.94g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.17g, network 0.16g, end-user device 0.60g.
Got: 0.94g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 112.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 112.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 14065 smartphones.

0.94g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 41% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.3 MB

Your site
0.94g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.17g
Network
0.16g
End-user device
0.60g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 9.4 kg · Annual: 112.5 kg · ≈ 14065 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
59th percentile
FIX
59th percentile
Warning::
0.94g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 41% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 59th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.94g

59th percentile

Cleaner than 41% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 56% more
vs Target 88% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
95% cached
PASS
95% cached
Info::
95% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 172 KB (vs 3390 KB first visit). 47 of 48 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.89g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.05g CO2 (first visit: 0.94g)
First visit
3390 KB
Repeat visit
172 KB

95% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.89g CO2 per returning visitor

47 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 111 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 111 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 111 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3390 KB
Theoretical minimum 3279 KB
Potential savings 111 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback