Skip to content
https://miglioreagenzia.it

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
89
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
1
PASS
5
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
5 PASS 1 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.23g CO2 per view
PASS
0.23g CO2 per view
Info::
0.23g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.8 MB, producing an estimated 0.23g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.04g, network 0.04g, end-user device 0.15g.
Got: 0.23g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 27.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 27.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 3414 smartphones.

0.23g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 88% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.8 MB

Your site
0.23g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.04g
Network
0.04g
End-user device
0.15g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 2.3 kg · Annual: 27.3 kg · ≈ 3414 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 13 KB (vs 822 KB first visit). 40 of 41 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.22g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.23g)
First visit
822 KB
Repeat visit
13 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.22g CO2 per returning visitor

40 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
12th percentile
PASS
12th percentile
Info::
0.23g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 88% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 12th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.23g

12th percentile

Cleaner than 88% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 62% cleaner ✓
vs Target 54% cleaner ✓
A+
Transfer Efficiency
94% efficient
PASS
94% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 94%
Only 47 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
94% efficient

Total waste: 47 KB (6% of page weight)

Unused JS 47 KB

0.01g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 822 KB
Theoretical minimum 775 KB
Potential savings 47 KB (0.01g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
1 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
1 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
12 images, 59 KB total, 55 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

12

Total Size

59 KB

Oversized

2

Wasted

55 KB

12 missing dimensions 1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback