Skip to content
https://mtv.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
54
GRADE
F
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.89g CO2 per view
FIX
1.89g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.89g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 6.7 MB, producing an estimated 1.89g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.35g, network 0.33g, end-user device 1.22g.
Got: 1.89g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 227.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 227.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 28421 smartphones.

1.89g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 14% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 6.7 MB

Your site
1.89g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.35g
Network
0.33g
End-user device
1.22g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 18.9 kg · Annual: 227.4 kg · ≈ 28421 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
86th percentile
FIX
86th percentile
Warning::
1.89g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 14% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 86th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.89g

86th percentile

Cleaner than 14% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 216% more
vs Target 279% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
67% efficient
REVIEW
67% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 67%
An estimated 2234 KB (33%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 2234 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.62g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
67% efficient

Total waste: 2234 KB (33% of page weight)

Unused JS 2234 KB

0.62g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 6851 KB
Theoretical minimum 4616 KB
Potential savings 2234 KB (0.62g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 231 KB (vs 6851 KB first visit). 182 of 183 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.83g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.06g CO2 (first visit: 1.89g)
First visit
6851 KB
Repeat visit
231 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.83g CO2 per returning visitor

182 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback