Skip to content
https://www.newlivingdesigns.com.au

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
2.85g CO2 per view
FIX
2.85g CO2 per view
Critical::
2.85g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 10.1 MB, producing an estimated 2.85g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.53g, network 0.49g, end-user device 1.83g.
Got: 2.85g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 341.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 341.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 42728 smartphones.

2.85g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 10.1 MB

Your site
2.85g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.53g
Network
0.49g
End-user device
1.83g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 28.5 kg · Annual: 341.8 kg · ≈ 42728 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
2.85g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

2.85g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 375% more
vs Target 470% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 97 KB (vs 10299 KB first visit). 114 of 116 resources are served from browser cache, saving 2.82g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 2.85g)
First visit
10299 KB
Repeat visit
97 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 2.82g CO2 per returning visitor

114 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 339 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 339 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 339 KB

0.09g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 10299 KB
Theoretical minimum 9960 KB
Potential savings 339 KB (0.09g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
18 images, 196 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

18

Total Size

196 KB

13 missing dimensions 17 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback