Skip to content
https://ni.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
56
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
1
PASS
2
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
2 PASS 1 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
3.20g CO2 per view
FIX
3.20g CO2 per view
Critical::
3.20g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 11.3 MB, producing an estimated 3.20g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.59g, network 0.55g, end-user device 2.05g.
Got: 3.20g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 383.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 383.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 47973 smartphones.

3.20g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 5% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 11.3 MB

Your site
3.20g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.59g
Network
0.55g
End-user device
2.05g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 32.0 kg · Annual: 383.8 kg · ≈ 47973 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
95th percentile
FIX
95th percentile
Warning::
3.20g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 5% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 95th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

3.20g

95th percentile

Cleaner than 5% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 433% more
vs Target 540% more
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 23 KB (vs 11564 KB first visit). 122 of 124 resources are served from browser cache, saving 3.19g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 3.20g)
First visit
11564 KB
Repeat visit
23 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 3.19g CO2 per returning visitor

122 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
93% efficient
PASS
93% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 93%
Only 824 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
93% efficient

Total waste: 824 KB (7% of page weight)

Unused JS 824 KB

0.23g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 11564 KB
Theoretical minimum 10739 KB
Potential savings 824 KB (0.23g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback