Skip to content
https://nme.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
71
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025
Info::
AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting AWS✗CDN AWS CloudFront✗

AWS: Renewable energy varies by region; committed to 100% by 2025

AWS CloudFront: Renewable varies by edge location

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
67% efficient
REVIEW
67% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 67%
An estimated 469 KB (33%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 469 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.13g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
67% efficient

Total waste: 469 KB (33% of page weight)

Unused JS 469 KB

0.13g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1439 KB
Theoretical minimum 969 KB
Potential savings 469 KB (0.13g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.40g CO2 per view
PASS
0.40g CO2 per view
Info::
0.40g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.40g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.07g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.26g.
Got: 0.40g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 47.8 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 47.8 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 5971 smartphones.

0.40g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 71% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.4 MB

Your site
0.40g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.07g
Network
0.07g
End-user device
0.26g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.0 kg · Annual: 47.8 kg · ≈ 5971 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
93% cached
PASS
93% cached
Info::
93% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 93 KB (vs 1439 KB first visit). 55 of 56 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.37g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.03g CO2 (first visit: 0.40g)
First visit
1439 KB
Repeat visit
93 KB

93% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.37g CO2 per returning visitor

55 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
29th percentile
PASS
29th percentile
Info::
0.40g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 71% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 29th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.40g

29th percentile

Cleaner than 71% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 34% cleaner ✓
vs Target 20% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback