Skip to content
https://pars-setia.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
81
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
3
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
33th percentile
REVIEW
33th percentile
Info::
0.43g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 67% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 33th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.43g

33rd percentile

Cleaner than 67% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 28% cleaner ✓
vs Target 14% cleaner ✓
B
Web Font Weight Variants
7 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
7 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Info::
7 font weights loaded -- review whether all are used
5+ weights for a single page is often more than needed. Compare against the actual font-weight CSS rules in your stylesheets; trim weights that aren't applied to any element. Affected families: Montserrat, Playfair Display.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.43g CO2 per view
PASS
0.43g CO2 per view
Info::
0.43g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.43g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.28g.
Got: 0.43g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 51.9 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 51.9 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6481 smartphones.

0.43g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 67% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.5 MB

Your site
0.43g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.08g
Network
0.07g
End-user device
0.28g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.3 kg · Annual: 51.9 kg · ≈ 6481 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 12 KB (vs 1562 KB first visit). 39 of 40 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.43g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.43g)
First visit
1562 KB
Repeat visit
12 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.43g CO2 per returning visitor

39 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient
Actual transfer 1562 KB
Theoretical minimum 1562 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
57 images, 1287 KB total, 285 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

57

Total Size

1287 KB

Oversized

1

Wasted

285 KB

12 missing alt text 40 missing dimensions 39 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback