Skip to content
https://printxpressgp.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
68
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.98g CO2 per view
FIX
0.98g CO2 per view
Info::
0.98g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.98g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.18g, network 0.17g, end-user device 0.63g.
Got: 0.98g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 117.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 117.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 14670 smartphones.

0.98g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 40% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.5 MB

Your site
0.98g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.18g
Network
0.17g
End-user device
0.63g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 9.8 kg · Annual: 117.4 kg · ≈ 14670 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
60th percentile
FIX
60th percentile
Warning::
0.98g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 40% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 60th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.98g

60th percentile

Cleaner than 40% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 63% more
vs Target 96% more
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
68% efficient
REVIEW
68% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 68%
An estimated 1142 KB (32%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1142 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.32g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
68% efficient

Total waste: 1142 KB (32% of page weight)

Unused JS 1142 KB

0.32g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 3536 KB
Theoretical minimum 2393 KB
Potential savings 1142 KB (0.32g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 74 KB (vs 3536 KB first visit). 79 of 81 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.96g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.98g)
First visit
3536 KB
Repeat visit
74 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.96g CO2 per returning visitor

79 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Web Font Weight Variants
4 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
PASS
4 font weights loaded across 1 famil(y/ies) -- reasonable
Info::
4 font weight(s) loaded across 1 famil(y/ies)
Image Optimization
14 images, 358 KB total, 236 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

14

Total Size

358 KB

Oversized

10

Wasted

236 KB

4 missing dimensions 3 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback