Accessibility
· 13 checks — Landmarks, headings, alt text, forms, and link quality rolled into one auditable list.DLandmark StructureActionNo landmarksFIX
No landmarks detected
Screen reader users have no way to navigate by region.
Screen reader users cannot quickly navigate to the primary content. Wrap your main content in <main>.
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Learn more ▾ ▴
The <main> element marks the page's primary content area. Assistive tech offers a 'jump to main' shortcut — but only if <main> exists. Without it, every page navigation forces re-reading the header. Wrap your primary content in a single <main>.
Source: WAI-ARIA / WCAG 2.4.1
Add a skip link as the first focusable element so keyboard users can bypass repeated navigation.
Without a skip-nav link, keyboard users tab through every nav item before reaching content — every page, every visit.
Learn more ▾ ▴
WCAG 2.4.1 (Bypass Blocks) requires a mechanism to skip past repeated content. The standard implementation is a 'Skip to main content' link that's the first focusable element, visually hidden until focused. Three lines of HTML + four of CSS.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 2.4.1
DWeb ManifestActionNot foundFIX
No web manifest found.
DDark Mode SupportActionNo dark mode signalsFIX
Detection limited to meta tags and inline styles.
DPrint StylesheetActionNo print stylesFIX
CHeading HierarchyAction9 headings, 1 skip(s)REVIEW
- H2 Search RFCs
- H4 The RFC Series skipped
- H4 Browse the RFC Index
- H4 Browse RFCs by Status
- H2 The Series
- H2 For Authors
- H2 Mailing Lists
- H2 Sponsor
- H2 Recent RFCs
Every page should have one H1 that describes the page content.
No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.
Learn more ▾ ▴
The H1 is the document title for assistive tech and a strong signal to search engines about page topic. Pages without one force screen readers to fall back to the <title> attribute or page chrome. Add a single H1 that names the page's primary subject.
Source: WCAG 2.4.6 / Google Search Central
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline. Screen readers may interpret missing levels as structural errors.
Skipping heading levels breaks the document outline — screen-reader users lose track of section nesting.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Screen reader users navigate by jumping between headings (H1 → H2 → H3). Skipping (H1 → H3) breaks the sense of hierarchy. Use sequential levels even if you don't like the default styling — restyle with CSS instead. WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) treats this as an A failure.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 1.3.1 / W3C WAI
BForm Accessibility2 of 2 controls have issuesREVIEW
| Control | Type | Label | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| #combo_box_id | text | (number, title, keyword, or author surname) | placeholder only |
| #combo_box_id | text | (number, title, keyword, or author surname) | placeholder only |
Placeholder text disappears on focus and is not a reliable label.
<input type="text" name="combo_box" id="combo_box_id">; <input type="text" name="combo_box" id="combo_box_id">
Placeholder-only labels disappear when the user starts typing — they must remember what the field was for.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Placeholders are NOT labels. They vanish on input, fail color contrast checks (most are gray), and don't satisfy WCAG SC 3.3.2. Always use a real <label> alongside (or aria-labelledby).
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 3.3.2 / Nielsen Norman
BLink & Button Quality2 issue(s) across 69 links and 1 buttonsREVIEW
| Element | Text | Issue | Suggested Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| (empty) | empty | Add link text or aria-label | |
| (empty) | empty | Add link text or aria-label |
Links without text are announced as raw URLs by screen readers.
a#top; a#rmp-menu-title-link
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Source: WCAG 2.1 SC 2.4.4
B404 Error PageHTTP 404, custom pageREVIEW
BFavicon & Branding4 icon(s) detectedREVIEW
CLighthouse Accessibility AuditsActionScore 78/100 — 7 failing, 18 passedREVIEW
Accessibility
These checks highlight opportunities to improve the accessibility of your web app. Automatic detection can only detect a subset of issues and does not guarantee the accessibility of your web app, so manual testing is also encouraged.
Navigation
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. Learn more about heading order.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
The RFC Series div#content > div#post-52 > div.singlepost > h4 |
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Internationalization and localization
If a page doesn't specify a `lang` attribute, a screen reader assumes that the page is in the default language that the user chose when setting up the screen reader. If the page isn't actually in the default language, then the screen reader might not announce the page's text correctly. Learn more about the `lang` attribute.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
html html |
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Contrast
Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Link text that is discernible improves the experience for users with low vision. Learn how to make links distinguishable.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
IETF div#post-52 > div.singlepost > p > a |
IRTF div#post-52 > div.singlepost > p > a |
IAB div#post-52 > div.singlepost > p > a |
Independent Submissions div#post-52 > div.singlepost > p > a |
Editorial div#post-52 > div.singlepost > p > a |
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Names and labels
Link text (and alternate text for images, when used as links) that is discernible, unique, and focusable improves the navigation experience for screen reader users. Learn how to make links accessible.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
body.home > div#rmp-container-2538 > div#rmp-menu-title-2538 > a#rmp-menu-title-link body.home > div#rmp-container-2538 > div#rmp-menu-title-2538 > a#rmp-menu-title-link |
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Best practices
Disabling zooming is problematic for users with low vision who rely on screen magnification to properly see the contents of a web page. Learn more about the viewport meta tag.
Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.
Source: MDN Permissions-Policy
| Failing Elements |
|---|
head > meta head > meta |
Touch targets with sufficient size and spacing help users who may have difficulty targeting small controls to activate the targets. Learn more about touch targets.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
RSS ul > li#rss-2 > h2.widgettitle > a.rsswidget |
RFC 9913: Reliable and Available Wireless (RAW) Technologies li#rss-2 > ul > li > a.rsswidget |
RFC 9912: Reliable and Available Wireless (RAW) Architecture li#rss-2 > ul > li > a.rsswidget |
One main landmark helps screen reader users navigate a web page. Learn more about landmarks.
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
| Failing Elements |
|---|
html html |
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
A+Alt Text QualityAll 2 images OKPASS
A+Color Contrast (Screenshot)20 text elements analyzed, 0 fail WCAG AAPASS
Analyzes text contrast against the actual rendered page, including background images, gradients, and overlays that CSS-based tools cannot detect.
Show all checked elements (20)
| Element | Ratio | Required | FG | BG | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h2 Search RFCs | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h2 The Series | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h2 For Authors | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h2 Mailing Lists | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h2 Sponsor | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| title » RFC Editor | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a Advanced Search | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a RFC Editor | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h4 The RFC Series | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p The RFC Series (ISSN… | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a IETF | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p ), the Internet Rese… | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a IRTF | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p ), the Internet Arch… | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a IAB | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a Independent Submissi… | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| p , and | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a Editorial | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| h4 Browse the RFC Index | 21.00:1 | 3.0:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
| a HTML (ascending) | 21.00:1 | 4.5:1 | #000000 | #FFFFFF | Pass |
Methodology: The top 20 text elements by font size were checked. Background color was sampled from the desktop screenshot using a 5-point pattern. WCAG 2.1 AA requires 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text.