Skip to content
http://www.rheinmetall.ch

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
85
GRADE
B
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
F
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
1.57g CO2 per view
FIX
1.57g CO2 per view
Warning::
1.57g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 5.5 MB, producing an estimated 1.57g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.29g, network 0.27g, end-user device 1.01g.
Got: 1.57g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 188.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 188.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 23548 smartphones.

1.57g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 23% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 5.5 MB

Your site
1.57g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.29g
Network
0.27g
End-user device
1.01g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 15.7 kg · Annual: 188.4 kg · ≈ 23548 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

F
Carbon Budget
Action
77th percentile
FIX
77th percentile
Warning::
1.57g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 23% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 77th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

1.57g

77th percentile

Cleaner than 23% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 162% more
vs Target 214% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 84 KB (vs 5676 KB first visit). 71 of 73 resources are served from browser cache, saving 1.55g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 1.57g)
First visit
5676 KB
Repeat visit
84 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 1.55g CO2 per returning visitor

71 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
97% efficient
PASS
97% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 97%
Only 146 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
97% efficient

Total waste: 146 KB (3% of page weight)

Unused JS 146 KB

0.04g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 5676 KB
Theoretical minimum 5530 KB
Potential savings 146 KB (0.04g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
26 images, 53 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

26

Total Size

53 KB

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback