Skip to content
https://santander.com.br

Sustainability

· 7 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
70
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
3
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
7
1 PASS 3 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.82g CO2 per view
FIX
0.82g CO2 per view
Info::
0.82g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.82g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.15g, network 0.14g, end-user device 0.53g.
Got: 0.82g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 98.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 98.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 12295 smartphones.

0.82g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 44% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.9 MB

Your site
0.82g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.15g
Network
0.14g
End-user device
0.53g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 8.2 kg · Annual: 98.4 kg · ≈ 12295 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
56th percentile
FIX
56th percentile
Warning::
0.82g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 44% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 56th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.82g

56th percentile

Cleaner than 44% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 37% more
vs Target 64% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
79% efficient
REVIEW
79% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 79%
An estimated 631 KB (21%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 631 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.17g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
79% efficient

Total waste: 631 KB (21% of page weight)

Unused JS 631 KB

0.17g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2963 KB
Theoretical minimum 2332 KB
Potential savings 631 KB (0.17g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 28 KB (vs 2963 KB first visit). 163 of 167 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.81g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.82g)
First visit
2963 KB
Repeat visit
28 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.81g CO2 per returning visitor

163 resources served from cache · 4 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback