Performance
· 24 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
465 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
566 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
28 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.007
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.52 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.55 s
Page Load Progression
FHTTP CachingActionNo cache headersFIX
No Cache-Control header
Adding a Cache-Control header can significantly improve repeat-visit performance.
BPage Weight Budget1.1 MB transferred, 86 requestsREVIEW
BImage Optimization50 images, 0 KB saveableREVIEW
BJS Execution Cost705ms total JS executionREVIEW
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/ | 332ms | 36ms | 6ms | 1st |
| Unattributable | 147ms | 6ms | 0ms | 1st |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-R35CE3JWHQ&cx=c>m=4e6aj1h2 | 108ms | 90ms | 12ms | 3rd |
| https://mc.yandex.com/metrika/tag.js | 65ms | 57ms | 5ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TVLPKZ9C | 53ms | 42ms | 11ms | 3rd |
CJS BundlesAction14 scripts, 173 KB unusedREVIEW
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-R35CE3JWHQ&cx=c>m=4e6aj1h2 | 189 KB | 72 KB (38%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TVLPKZ9C | 136 KB | 64 KB (48%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://mc.yandex.com/metrika/tag.js | 69 KB | 36 KB (53%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/plugins/duracelltomi-google-tag-manager/build/gtm4wp-ecommerce-generic.js?ver=2.0.6 | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/litespeed/js/4d5bf675c449f0a3a201a99ece1eb840.js?ver=f03cc | 19 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/litespeed/js/13ccc689bfa1e3b0e0896b979c3b1ec3.js?ver=a482a | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/plugins/litespeed-cache/assets/js/css_async.min.js | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/themes/flatsome/assets/js/flatsome.js?ver=c70e5a9a66ada87bcb37 | 18 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/themes/flatsome/assets/js/chunk.slider.js?ver=3.20.11 | 13 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
| https://serebrokubachi.ru/wp-content/themes/flatsome/assets/js/chunk.popups.js?ver=3.20.11 | 7 KB | — | ✓ | 1st |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
BDocument CompressionDocument response uses gzip; brotli would be ~20% smallerREVIEW
BMain HTML Cache-ControlNo Cache-Control header on main HTML responseREVIEW
BServer-Timing ObservabilityNo Server-Timing header foundREVIEW
CGreen HostingActionWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructureREVIEW
Green Hosting
No green hosting detected
AThird-Party Impact36% third-party, 0 ms blockingPASS
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
A+Font Loading5 fonts (64 KB)PASS
Web fonts
5
64 KB total
Render-blocking
0
of 5
Dominant font-display
swap
Most common across fonts
Font loading timeline
Optimization checklist
- Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
- Use woff2 format for all fonts
- Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
- Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource HintsNo optimization neededPASS
A+HTTP/3 (QUIC)HTTP/3 advertised via Alt-SvcPASS
A+LCP Image PreloadLCP preload audit not availablePASS
A+Server Response Intelligence2 server-response signal(s) detectedPASS
APage Weight Inventory86 resources · 1.1 MB · 173 KB savings availablePASS
~172.8 KiB of savings available
| # | Resource | Type | Size | Cache | Unused | 3rd party | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | ||||||
| 86 resources | 1.1 MiB | ||||||
Asset CompressionNo text asset hosts to measureINFO
Network Waterfall86 requests over 17816msINFO
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 108ms | 189 KB | 38% | ₽56/mo | Costly |
mc.yandex.com mc.yandex.com | Other | 65ms | 69 KB | 53% | ₽34/mo | Optional |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 53ms | 136 KB | 48% | ₽28/mo | Optional |
These scripts may cost more than they're worth
- Google Tag Manager adds 108ms and costs ~₽56/month
Google Tag Manager takes 108ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
53% of mc.yandex.com's code is unused. The script may be loading features you don't use.
Bundle has high unused-code ratio — tree-shaking and route-splitting recover the wasted bytes.
Source: web.dev
Real-User Performance (CrUX)Field metrics from the Chrome User Experience ReportINFO
Chrome User Experience (CrUX)
Real-user metrics from the Chrome UX Report (2026-09-21 — 2026-10-18)
LCP (p75)
2028 ms
80% good
INP (p75)
120 ms
92% good
CLS (p75)
0.000
99% good
FCP (p75)
1901 ms
TTFB (p75)
1887 ms
Image Optimization48 images, 184 KB total, 13 KB wastedINFO
Image Optimization Audit
Total Images
48
Total Size
184 KB
Oversized
4
Wasted
13 KB