Skip to content
https://servtop.com.br

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
74
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
5
PASS
1
INFO
1
Checks
8
1 PASS 5 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP ServerCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.55g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.55g CO2 per view
Info::
0.55g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.55g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.10g, network 0.09g, end-user device 0.35g.
Got: 0.55g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 65.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 65.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8198 smartphones.

0.55g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 56% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.9 MB

Your site
0.55g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.10g
Network
0.09g
End-user device
0.35g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.5 kg · Annual: 65.6 kg · ≈ 8198 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
44th percentile
REVIEW
44th percentile
Info::
0.55g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 56% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 44th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.55g

44th percentile

Cleaner than 56% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 9% cleaner ✓
vs Target 9% more
B
Transfer Efficiency
86% efficient
REVIEW
86% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 86%
An estimated 268 KB (14%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 268 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.07g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
86% efficient

Total waste: 268 KB (14% of page weight)

Unused JS 268 KB

0.07g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1976 KB
Theoretical minimum 1707 KB
Potential savings 268 KB (0.07g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
Web Font Weight Variants
6 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
6 font weights loaded across 2 famil(y/ies)
Info::
6 font weights loaded -- review whether all are used
5+ weights for a single page is often more than needed. Compare against the actual font-weight CSS rules in your stylesheets; trim weights that aren't applied to any element. Affected families: Inter, Libre Caslon Text.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
100% cached
PASS
100% cached
Info::
100% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 1 KB (vs 1976 KB first visit). 24 of 25 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.55g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.55g)
First visit
1976 KB
Repeat visit
1 KB

100% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.55g CO2 per returning visitor

24 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

Image Optimization
37 images, 1172 KB total, 762 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

37

Total Size

1172 KB

Oversized

4

Wasted

762 KB

37 missing dimensions 3 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback