Skip to content
https://svoyaaptechka.ru

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
83
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP Server✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.39g CO2 per view
PASS
0.39g CO2 per view
Info::
0.39g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.4 MB, producing an estimated 0.39g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.07g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.25g.
Got: 0.39g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 46.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 46.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 5826 smartphones.

0.39g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 72% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.4 MB

Your site
0.39g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.07g
Network
0.07g
End-user device
0.25g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 3.9 kg · Annual: 46.6 kg · ≈ 5826 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 44 KB (vs 1404 KB first visit). 50 of 51 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.38g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.39g)
First visit
1404 KB
Repeat visit
44 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.38g CO2 per returning visitor

50 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A
Carbon Budget
28th percentile
PASS
28th percentile
Info::
0.39g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 72% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 28th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.39g

28th percentile

Cleaner than 72% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 35% cleaner ✓
vs Target 22% cleaner ✓
A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient
Actual transfer 1404 KB
Theoretical minimum 1404 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
36 images, 1309 KB total, 225 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

36

Total Size

1309 KB

Oversized

7

Wasted

225 KB

15 missing dimensions 4 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback