Skip to content
https://tass.ru

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
66
GRADE
D
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
3
INFO
0
Checks
6
3 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
62% efficient
REVIEW
62% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 62%
An estimated 95 KB (38%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 95 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.03g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
62% efficient

Total waste: 95 KB (38% of page weight)

Unused JS 95 KB

0.03g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 252 KB
Theoretical minimum 157 KB
Potential savings 95 KB (0.03g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
CO2 Per Page Load
0.07g CO2 per view
PASS
0.07g CO2 per view
Info::
0.07g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.2 MB, producing an estimated 0.07g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.01g, network 0.01g, end-user device 0.04g.
Got: 0.07g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 8.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 8.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 1046 smartphones.

0.07g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 90% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.2 MB

Your site
0.07g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.01g
Network
0.01g
End-user device
0.04g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 0.7 kg · Annual: 8.4 kg · ≈ 1046 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 1 KB (vs 252 KB first visit). 14 of 16 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.07g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.00g CO2 (first visit: 0.07g)
First visit
252 KB
Repeat visit
1 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.07g CO2 per returning visitor

14 resources served from cache · 2 resources re-downloaded

A+
Carbon Budget
10th percentile
PASS
10th percentile
Info::
0.07g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 90% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 10th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.07g

10th percentile

Cleaner than 90% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 88% cleaner ✓
vs Target 86% cleaner ✓
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback