Skip to content
https://td.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
71
GRADE
C
FIX
1
REVIEW
3
PASS
2
INFO
0
Checks
6
2 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Not identifiedCDN Akamai

Akamai: Committed to 50% renewable by 2030

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
Carbon Budget
36th percentile
REVIEW
36th percentile
Info::
0.46g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 64% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 36th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.46g

36th percentile

Cleaner than 64% of websites

Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 23% cleaner ✓
vs Target 7% cleaner ✓
C
Transfer Efficiency
Action
71% efficient
REVIEW
71% efficient
Warning::
Transfer efficiency: 71%
An estimated 489 KB (29%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 489 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.14g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
71% efficient

Total waste: 489 KB (29% of page weight)

Unused JS 489 KB

0.14g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 1673 KB
Theoretical minimum 1184 KB
Potential savings 489 KB (0.14g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A
CO2 Per Page Load
0.46g CO2 per view
PASS
0.46g CO2 per view
Info::
0.46g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.6 MB, producing an estimated 0.46g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.09g, network 0.08g, end-user device 0.30g.
Got: 0.46g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 55.5 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 55.5 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6942 smartphones.

0.46g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 64% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.6 MB

Your site
0.46g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.09g
Network
0.08g
End-user device
0.30g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.6 kg · Annual: 55.5 kg · ≈ 6942 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 41 KB (vs 1673 KB first visit). 48 of 49 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.45g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.46g)
First visit
1673 KB
Repeat visit
41 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.45g CO2 per returning visitor

48 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback