Skip to content
https://the-spider.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
71
GRADE
C
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
2
INFO
1
Checks
8
2 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
CO2 Per Page Load
Action
0.91g CO2 per view
FIX
0.91g CO2 per view
Info::
0.91g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 3.2 MB, producing an estimated 0.91g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.17g, network 0.16g, end-user device 0.59g.
Got: 0.91g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 109.6 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 109.6 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 13694 smartphones.

0.91g

Carbon Footprint per page view

Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 42% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 3.2 MB

Your site
0.91g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.17g
Network
0.16g
End-user device
0.59g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 9.1 kg · Annual: 109.6 kg · ≈ 13694 smartphone charges
D
Green Hosting
Action
Not green
FIX
Not green
Info::
No confirmed renewable energy commitment detected
Consider providers like Cloudflare, Google Cloud, or Vercel that match 100% of their energy use with renewables.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingNot Green Hosted
Hosting Apache HTTP ServerCDN Not identified

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
58th percentile
FIX
58th percentile
Warning::
0.91g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 42% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 58th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.91g

58th percentile

Cleaner than 42% of websites

Above the median website

vs Median 52% more
vs Target 83% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
99% cached
PASS
99% cached
Info::
99% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 43 KB (vs 3301 KB first visit). 35 of 36 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.90g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.91g)
First visit
3301 KB
Repeat visit
43 KB

99% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.90g CO2 per returning visitor

35 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient
Actual transfer 3301 KB
Theoretical minimum 3301 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
22 images, 2219 KB total, 434 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

22

Total Size

2219 KB

Oversized

4

Wasted

434 KB

22 missing dimensions 19 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback