Skip to content
https://timhopam.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
80
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
4
PASS
2
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
2 PASS 4 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.54g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.54g CO2 per view
Info::
0.54g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 1.9 MB, producing an estimated 0.54g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.10g, network 0.09g, end-user device 0.34g.
Got: 0.54g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 64.3 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 64.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 8033 smartphones.

0.54g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 57% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.9 MB

Your site
0.54g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.10g
Network
0.09g
End-user device
0.34g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 5.4 kg · Annual: 64.3 kg · ≈ 8033 smartphone charges
B
Carbon Budget
43th percentile
REVIEW
43th percentile
Info::
0.54g CO2 — below the median website (0.60g)
Better than an estimated 57% of websites, but above the sustainability target of 0.50g. Reducing page weight would help reach the target.
Info::
Estimated 43th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.54g

43rd percentile

Cleaner than 57% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 11% cleaner ✓
vs Target 7% more
B
Web Font Weight Variants
No detectable Google Fonts weights
REVIEW
No detectable Google Fonts weights
Info::
No detectable Google Fonts weights
The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
98% cached
PASS
98% cached
Info::
98% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 42 KB (vs 1936 KB first visit). 27 of 28 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.52g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.54g)
First visit
1936 KB
Repeat visit
42 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.52g CO2 per returning visitor

27 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient
Actual transfer 1936 KB
Theoretical minimum 1936 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
47 images, 1119 KB total, 856 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

47

Total Size

1119 KB

Oversized

21

Wasted

856 KB

1 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback