Skip to content
https://viadeo.com

Sustainability

· 6 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
62
GRADE
D
FIX
3
REVIEW
2
PASS
1
INFO
0
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
6
1 PASS 2 REVIEW 3 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

D
Carbon Budget
Action
55th percentile
FIX
55th percentile
Warning::
0.78g CO2 — above the median website (0.60g)
Heavier than an estimated 45% of websites. Reducing page weight, optimizing images, and removing unused JavaScript would lower the carbon footprint. See the Performance tab.
Info::
Estimated 55th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.78g

55th percentile

Cleaner than 45% of websites

✗ Above the median website

vs Median 31% more
vs Target 57% more
D
Transfer Efficiency
Action
49% efficient
FIX
49% efficient
Critical::
Transfer efficiency: 49%
An estimated 1442 KB (51%) could be eliminated: 0 KB via better compression, 0 KB via modern image formats, 1442 KB of unused JavaScript. This wasted data produces 0.40g of unnecessary CO2 per page view.
49% efficient

Total waste: 1442 KB (51% of page weight)

Unused JS 1442 KB

0.40g unnecessary CO2 per visit

Actual transfer 2838 KB
Theoretical minimum 1395 KB
Potential savings 1442 KB (0.40g CO2)

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

B
CO2 Per Page Load
0.78g CO2 per view
REVIEW
0.78g CO2 per view
Info::
0.78g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 2.8 MB, producing an estimated 0.78g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.15g, network 0.14g, end-user device 0.50g.
Got: 0.78g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 94.2 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 94.2 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 11774 smartphones.

0.78g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✗ Above sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 45% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 2.8 MB

Your site
0.78g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.15g
Network
0.14g
End-user device
0.50g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 7.8 kg · Annual: 94.2 kg · ≈ 11774 smartphone charges
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
Repeat Visit Weight
97% cached
PASS
97% cached
Info::
97% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 76 KB (vs 2838 KB first visit). 128 of 137 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.76g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.02g CO2 (first visit: 0.78g)
First visit
2838 KB
Repeat visit
76 KB

97% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.76g CO2 per returning visitor

128 resources served from cache · 9 resources re-downloaded

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback