Performance
· 17 checks — Lighthouse + waterfall + sustainability rolled into one auditable list.Performance-focused optimization plan with CWV assessment, top offenders, and time estimates
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.96 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.92 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.29 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.003
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.46 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.90 s
Page Load Progression
DThird-Party ImpactAction100% third-party, 0 ms blockingFIX
FJS Execution CostAction6131ms total JS executionFIX
Main Thread Breakdown
| Script | Total | Scripting | Parse/Compile | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.visme.co/ | 1386ms | 118ms | 10ms | 3rd |
| https://www.visme.co/wp-content/themes/visme/build/homepage6/homepage6.bundle.min.js | 1125ms | 245ms | 3ms | 3rd |
| https://js.hs-analytics.net/analytics/1776896400000/21774584.js | 725ms | 495ms | 15ms | 3rd |
| Unattributable | 679ms | 35ms | 0ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-QXSBG5DLSV | 512ms | 431ms | 76ms | 3rd |
| https://script.crazyegg.com/pages/versioned/commontransformations-scripts/df706026807a27b189c4eeedc429ebbf.js | 435ms | 382ms | 32ms | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-1053096647 | 363ms | 293ms | 67ms | 3rd |
| https://www.visme.co/wp-content/themes/visme/js/gsap/gsap-3.12.4.min.js | 333ms | 55ms | 9ms | 3rd |
| https://js.hubspot.com/web-interactives-embed.js | 107ms | 88ms | 15ms | 3rd |
| https://www.visme.co/wp-content/themes/visme/js/flickity.pkgd.min.js | 94ms | 31ms | 10ms | 3rd |
Showing top 10 of 15 scripts
DPage Weight InventoryAction109 resources · 1.5 MB · 255 KB savings availableFIX
~255.2 KiB of savings available
| # | Resource | Type | Size | Cache | Unused | 3rd party | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | ||||||
| 109 resources | 1.5 MiB | ||||||
FHTTP CachingActionNo cache headersFIX
No Cache-Control header
Adding a Cache-Control header can significantly improve repeat-visit performance.
BPage Weight Budget1.5 MB transferred, 109 requestsREVIEW
Large JavaScript bundles delay interactivity. Split code by route or defer non-critical scripts.
JavaScript bundle is large — code-split routes and lazy-load off-screen components to defer.
Source: web.dev
Each request adds latency. Bundle small files, use sprites, or eliminate unnecessary requests.
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
Source: web.dev
BImage Optimization41 images, 0 KB saveableREVIEW
CJS BundlesAction37 scripts, 255 KB unusedREVIEW
Downloaded but never executed on this page.
| Script | Size | Unused | Minified | Party |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-1053096647&cx=c>m=4e64k0 | 144 KB | 106 KB (73%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-QXSBG5DLSV | 178 KB | 58 KB (33%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-1053096647 | 144 KB | 56 KB (39%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://script.crazyegg.com/pages/versioned/commontransformations-scripts/df706026807a27b189c4eeedc429ebbf.js | 72 KB | 35 KB (49%) | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://static.cloudflareinsights.com/beacon.min.js/v8c78df7c7c0f484497ecbca7046644da1771523124516 | 11 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://js.usemessages.com/conversations-embed.js | 33 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.visme.co/wp-content/themes/visme/js/visme.requestbutton-new.min.js | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://dashboard.visme.co/register-visme3.js | 3 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://dashboard.visme.co/js/channel.js | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
| https://www.visme.co/wp-content/themes/visme/js/banner.min.js | 1 KB | — | ✓ | 3rd |
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
Consider code splitting or tree shaking to reduce unused code.
This bundle has high unused code — code-split or tree-shake to ship only what executes.
Source: web.dev / Lighthouse coverage
A+Text CompressionAll text resources are compressedPASS
A+Font Loading3 fonts (63 KB)PASS
Web fonts
3
63 KB total
Render-blocking
0
of 3
Dominant font-display
swap
Most common across fonts
Font loading timeline
Optimization checklist
- Preload critical fonts (priority=high)
- Use woff2 format for all fonts
- Set font-display to swap, optional, or fallback
- Subset large fonts (≤100 KB each)
A+Resource CachingAll resources properly cachedPASS
A+Critical Rendering PathNo render-blocking resourcesPASS
A+Resource HintsNo optimization neededPASS
A+Render-Blocking ResourcesNo render-blocking resources detectedPASS
A+Third-Party ResourcesNo third-party resources detectedPASS
A+Green HostingWhether the site is served from green-energy infrastructurePASS
Green Hosting
This site is hosted on green energy infrastructure
Provider: Cloudflare
Network Waterfall109 requests over 1798msINFO
Third-Party Script CostPer-script blocking time, transfer cost, and cache headersINFO
| Script | Category | Execution | Transfer | Unused | Monthly Cost | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
www.visme.co www.visme.co | Other | 1386ms | 43 KB | — | $18/mo | Costly |
www.visme.co www.visme.co | Other | 1125ms | 4 KB | — | $15/mo | Costly |
HubSpot Analytics js.hs-analytics.net | Analytics | 725ms | 42 KB | — | $10/mo | Costly |
Unattributable Unattributable | Other | 679ms | 0 KB | — | $9/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 512ms | 178 KB | 33% | $7/mo | Costly |
script.crazyegg.com script.crazyegg.com | Other | 435ms | 72 KB | 49% | $6/mo | Costly |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 363ms | 144 KB | 39% | $5/mo | Costly |
www.visme.co www.visme.co | Other | 333ms | 27 KB | — | $4/mo | Costly |
js.hubspot.com js.hubspot.com | Other | 107ms | 28 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
www.visme.co www.visme.co | Other | 94ms | 14 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
Google Tag Manager www.googletagmanager.com | Tag Manager | 89ms | 144 KB | 73% | $1/mo | Optional |
script.crazyegg.com script.crazyegg.com | Other | 78ms | 23 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
LinkedIn Insight snap.licdn.com | Advertising | 77ms | 19 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
js.usemessages.com js.usemessages.com | Other | 66ms | 33 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
Google Ads Conversion www.googleadservices.com | Advertising | 63ms | 23 KB | — | $1/mo | Optional |
These scripts may cost more than they're worth
- www.visme.co adds 1386ms and costs ~$18/month
- www.visme.co adds 1125ms and costs ~$15/month
- HubSpot Analytics adds 725ms and costs ~$10/month
- Unattributable adds 679ms and costs ~$9/month
- Google Tag Manager adds 512ms and costs ~$7/month
- script.crazyegg.com adds 435ms and costs ~$6/month
- Google Tag Manager adds 363ms and costs ~$5/month
- www.visme.co adds 333ms and costs ~$4/month
100% of JavaScript execution time is spent on third-party scripts. Consider auditing which scripts are essential.
When third-party JS execution time exceeds your own, performance gains from frontend work are capped by code you don't own.
Learn more ▾ ▴
Every millisecond of third-party JS competes with your own for main-thread time. If their share is bigger than yours, optimization on your code base barely moves the needle. Audit, defer, or remove third-parties before further frontend optimization. Use Lighthouse's third-party audit to identify the worst offenders.
Source: web.dev
www.visme.co takes 1386ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
www.visme.co takes 1125ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
HubSpot Analytics takes 725ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Unattributable takes 679ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 512ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
script.crazyegg.com takes 435ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
Google Tag Manager takes 363ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
www.visme.co takes 333ms of CPU time. Consider loading it asynchronously or replacing it with a lighter alternative.
This script has high main-thread execution time — optimize hot paths or defer.
Source: web.dev
73% of Google Tag Manager's code is unused. The script may be loading features you don't use.
Bundle has high unused-code ratio — tree-shaking and route-splitting recover the wasted bytes.
Source: web.dev