Skip to content
https://warriorsuccesssystems.com

Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
86
GRADE
B
FIX
1
REVIEW
2
PASS
4
INFO
1
Device:
Mobile Desktop
Checks
8
4 PASS 2 REVIEW 1 FIX
D
Green Hosting
Action
Unknown
FIX
Unknown
Info::
Hosting provider could not be identified
Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.
Info::
Green hosting status based on known provider commitments
Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.
Green HostingUnable to Determine
Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

C
Web Font Weight Variants
Action
12 font weights loaded across 4 famil(y/ies)
REVIEW
12 font weights loaded across 4 famil(y/ies)
Warning::
12 font weights loaded -- likely 100+ KB of unused payload
Loading 12 font weights typically transfers 200-400 KB just for fonts. Most pages legitimately use 2-3 weights (regular + bold, maybe medium). Audit which weights your stylesheet actually applies and trim the Google Fonts URL accordingly. Affected families: Barlow Condensed, Bebas Neue, Cinzel, Crimson Pro.
C
Green Hosting
Action
Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure
REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

A+
CO2 Per Page Load
0.15g CO2 per view
PASS
0.15g CO2 per view
Info::
0.15g CO2 per page view
This page transfers 0.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.15g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.03g, network 0.03g, end-user device 0.10g.
Got: 0.15g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)
Info::
At 10,000 monthly views: 18.4 kg CO2/year
With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 18.4 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 2301 smartphones.

0.15g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 90% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 0.5 MB

Your site
0.15g
Top 10%
0.20g
Target
0.50g
Median website
0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center
0.03g
Network
0.03g
End-user device
0.10g
At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 1.5 kg · Annual: 18.4 kg · ≈ 2301 smartphone charges
A+
Repeat Visit Weight
95% cached
PASS
95% cached
Info::
95% reduction on repeat visits
Returning visitors download only 29 KB (vs 554 KB first visit). 42 of 43 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.15g CO2 per repeat visit.
Info::
Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.15g)
First visit
554 KB
Repeat visit
29 KB

95% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.15g CO2 per returning visitor

42 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+
Carbon Budget
10th percentile
PASS
10th percentile
Info::
0.15g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g
Cleaner than an estimated 90% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.
Info::
Estimated 10th percentile
Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.
Top 10%
Target
Median website

0.15g

10th percentile

Cleaner than 90% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 74% cleaner ✓
vs Target 69% cleaner ✓
A+
Transfer Efficiency
100% efficient
PASS
100% efficient
Info::
Transfer efficiency: 100%
Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.
100% efficient
Actual transfer 554 KB
Theoretical minimum 554 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization
4 images, 78 KB total, 0 KB wasted
INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

4

Total Size

78 KB

2 missing alt text 3 missing lazy loading
All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback