Sustainability

· 8 checks — CO2 emissions, green hosting, repeat-visit weight, carbon budget, and transfer efficiency rolled into one auditable list.

SCORE

GRADE

FIX

REVIEW

PASS

INFO

Device:

Mobile Desktop

Checks

3 PASS 3 REVIEW 1 FIX

Green Hosting

Action

Unknown

FIX

Unknown

Hosting provider could not be identified

Without knowing the provider, we cannot determine their energy sourcing. Check with your hosting provider about their renewable energy commitments.

Green hosting status based on known provider commitments

Green hosting detection uses a curated database of provider renewable energy commitments. This is not a real-time verification. For authoritative checks, visit thegreenwebfoundation.org.

Green HostingUnable to Determine

Hosting Not identified✗CDN Not identified✗

Based on known provider commitments. Verify at thegreenwebfoundation.org

Carbon Budget

31th percentile

REVIEW

31th percentile

0.42g CO2 — below the sustainability target of 0.50g

Cleaner than an estimated 69% of websites analyzed. This page meets the Web Sustainability Guidelines target.

Estimated 31th percentile

Compared to: top 10% = 0.20g, target = 0.50g, median = 0.60g per page view.

Top 10%

Target

Median website

0.42g

31st percentile

Cleaner than 69% of websites

✓ Below the Web Sustainability Guidelines target

vs Median 30% cleaner ✓

vs Target 16% cleaner ✓

Web Font Weight Variants

No detectable Google Fonts weights

REVIEW

No detectable Google Fonts weights

The analyzer detects font weights via Google Fonts URL parameters (~70% of font-using sites). Self-hosted fonts and non-Google CDN fonts aren't visible to URL-based detection. If you self-host fonts, manually audit how many @font-face weights you ship -- 2-3 weights per family is typically enough; 5+ is usually unused payload.

Green Hosting

Action

Whether the site is served from green-energy infrastructure

REVIEW

Green Hosting

No green hosting detected

CO2 Per Page Load

0.42g CO2 per view

PASS

0.42g CO2 per view

0.42g CO2 per page view

This page transfers 1.5 MB, producing an estimated 0.42g of CO2 per visit using the Sustainable Web Design model (v4). Breakdown: data center 0.08g, network 0.07g, end-user device 0.27g.

Got: 0.42g CO2 Expected: < 0.50g (sustainability target)

At 10,000 monthly views: 50.3 kg CO2/year

With 10,000 page views per month, this page would generate approximately 50.3 kg of CO2 annually — equivalent to charging 6293 smartphones.

0.42g

Carbon Footprint per page view

✓ Below sustainability target (0.50g)

Cleaner than 69% of websites

Sustainable Web Design model v4 · Page size: 1.5 MB

Your site

0.42g

Top 10%

0.20g

Target

0.50g

Median website

0.60g

Energy Breakdown

Data center

0.08g

Network

0.07g

End-user device

0.27g

At 10,000 monthly views: Monthly: 4.2 kg · Annual: 50.3 kg · ≈ 6293 smartphone charges

A+

Repeat Visit Weight

98% cached

PASS

98% cached

98% reduction on repeat visits

Returning visitors download only 30 KB (vs 1516 KB first visit). 45 of 46 resources are served from browser cache, saving 0.41g CO2 per repeat visit.

Repeat visit: 0.01g CO2 (first visit: 0.42g)

First visit

1516 KB

Repeat visit

30 KB

98% reduction on repeat visits

Saving 0.41g CO2 per returning visitor

45 resources served from cache · 1 resources re-downloaded

A+

Transfer Efficiency

100% efficient

PASS

100% efficient

Transfer efficiency: 100%

Only 0 KB of potential savings identified. Your page is well-optimized for size.

Actual transfer 1516 KB

Theoretical minimum 1516 KB

See Deep Analysis sections above for specific optimizations.

Image Optimization

21 images, 289 KB total, 56 KB wasted

INFO

Image Optimization Audit

Total Images

Total Size

289 KB

Oversized

Wasted

56 KB

6 missing dimensions 8 missing lazy loading

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.