Skip to content
https://commons.wikimedia.org

SEO

· 7 checks — Canonical, meta, content depth, internal links, image SEO, and hreflang rolled into one auditable list.
SCORE
92
GRADE
A
FIX
0
REVIEW
0
PASS
6
INFO
1

Cross-tab audit — SEO, performance, crawlability, mobile, structured data

Checks
7
6 PASS
A+
Canonical URL
Properly configured
PASS
Properly configured
Info::
Canonical tag present
Got: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
Info::
Canonical is self-referencing
Info::
Canonical matches final URL after redirects
Info::
Canonical target returns 200
Canonical URL Configured
Page URL https://commons.wikimedia.org Canonical https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Match Self-referencing (correct) Target 200 ✓
A
Meta Tags
Title: 17 chars
PASS
Title: 17 chars
Info::
Page title is set
Got: Wikimedia Commons
Warning::
Title is only 17 characters — consider expanding
Info::
Title and H1 have very different wording
Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.
Title

"Wikimedia Commons"

17 characters Too short
Title: Wikimedia Commons
H1: Main Page
Match: Very different
Robots: Indexable (no restrictions)

Alignment helps users confirm they've reached the right page.

Why this matters

Title and H1 disagree significantly — Google may treat one as the canonical topic and the other as off-topic, weakening ranking.

Learn more ▾

Title is the SERP headline; H1 is the on-page headline. They should describe the same page. Large divergence (different topics, different keywords) signals confusion and Google may rewrite the title in SERP. Align both to the same primary topic.

Source: Google Search Central / on-page SEO

A
Content Depth
1366 words, Very Difficult
PASS
1366 words, Very Difficult
Info::
Page has 1366 words — good depth for search engines
Info::
Text-to-HTML ratio is 3%
Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.
Info::
Reading level: Very Difficult (grade 21)
1366 words

Good depth

Reading level

Very Easy
Easy
Fairly Easy
Standard
Fairly Difficult
Difficult
Very Difficult

Grade 21

Text-to-HTML Ratio

3% text 97% HTML

11 KB / 429 KB

Very low ratio suggests heavy framework overhead or boilerplate.

Why this matters

Informational: ratio of visible text bytes to total HTML bytes. Very low ratios suggest excessive markup overhead.

A+
Image SEO
22 images, 22 descriptive filenames
PASS
22 images, 22 descriptive filenames
Info::
All images have descriptive filenames
Info::
4 image(s) missing alt text — see Accessibility tab
22 descriptive
0 hash-based
0 generic
22 total
FilenameQualityAltIssues
500px-Lupa_Capitolina%2C_Rome.jpgdescriptive✗1
20px-Magnify-clip_%28sans_arrow%29.svg.pngdescriptive✗1
120px-Wiki_Loves_Africa_Logo_Vectorized.svg.pngdescriptive✗1
120px-Generic_Camera_Icon.svg.pngdescriptive✗1

See Accessibility tab for detailed alt text quality analysis.

A+
Schema Markup Audit
1 schema types detected
PASS

Rich result eligibility

Article Eligible

Article rich results

Detected schema types

Article json-ld → Article rich results
4/4 required · 1/2 recommended
Required fields (Google)
  • headline — Required — used as the rich result title
  • image — Required for top-stories carousel eligibility
  • author — Required by Google's E-E-A-T guidelines
  • datePublished — Required for time-sensitive rich results
Recommended fields
  • dateModified — Signals freshness to the news algorithm
  • description — Add a description / dek string Used as the result snippet
Google's spec for this type

Adding these recommended fields improves chances of getting Article rich results in search results.

Why this matters

Schema entity has required fields but could add recommended ones for richer SERP layouts (star ratings, prices, etc.).

Source: Google Search Central

Hreflang
0 hreflang tags
INFO
0 hreflang tags

No hreflang tags detected.

Hreflang tags are only needed for multilingual or multi-regional sites.

All checks on this page are automated. Results are estimates - run targeted manual reviews when the score affects a release decision.

Send Feedback